On 6/24/25 12:15 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> For the test implementation of the SuperH architecture a second serial
> serial port needs to be used. Unfortunately the currently used 'stdio'
"Serial" typed twice? :-)
> driver does not support multiple serial ports at the same time.
>
> Switc
On 9/13/23 2:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Creating new a new super_block vs freeing the old one for single instance
^
I can't parse that. :-)
> file systems is serialized by the wait for SB_DEAD.
>
> Remove the superfluous sb_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwi
with the same text.
>>> Let's put the starting text into the pr_notice() call -- it saves 21
>>> bytes of the object code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Joe Perches
>>> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey
On 4/5/21 11:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Sergey Shtylyov
>
> [ Upstream commit 705e9195187d85249fbb0eaa844b1604a98fbc9a ]
>
> The 'reason' variable in module_sig_check() points to 3 strings across
> the *switch* statement, all needlessly starting wit
mode).
Fixes: f351b2d638c3 ("sata_mv: Support SoC controllers")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Index: linux-block/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
===
--- linux-blo
ome reason?) the starts
of the multi-line comments not being /* on their own line...
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
This patch is against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's 'linux.git'
repo plus my 2 patches posted this week.
I'm not sure such patches ar
ome reason?) the starts
of the multi-line comments not being /* on their own line...
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
This patch is against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's 'linux.git'
repo plus my 2 patches posted this week.
I'm not sure such patches ar
Some functions have the proper 'kernel-doc' comments but these don't start
with proper /** -- fix that, along with adding () to the function name on
the following lines to fully comply with the 'kernel-doc' format.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
kernel/module.c |
Some 'kernel-doc' function comments do not fully comply with the specified
format due to:
- missing () after the function name;
- "RETURNS:"/"Returns:" instead of "Return:" when documenting the function's
result.
- empty line before describing the
Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm cleaning up the 'kernel-doc' function comments...
[1/2] module: fix up 'kernel-doc' comments
[2/2] module: add more 'kernel-doc' comments
/dash,
spell out "nomem" as "lack of memory" in these comments, while at it...
Suggested-by: Joe Perches
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
Changes in version 2:
- new patch.
kernel/module.c | 26 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletion
Let's move the common handling of the non-fatal errors after the *switch*
statement -- this avoids *goto*s inside that *switch*...
Suggested-by: Joe Perches
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
Changes in version 2:
- new patch.
kernel/module.c | 20 ++--
1 file change
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
Changes in version 2:
- put less starting text into the pr_notice() call;
- updated the patch description accordingly, added the "Suggested-by:" tag.
kernel/module.c |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Ind
Here are 3 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm doing some refactoring in module_sig_check()...
[1/3] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
[2/3] module: avoid *goto*s in module_sig_check()
[3/3] module: only handle errors with the *swit
Hello!
On 10/22/20 6:09 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
>> 'linux.git' repo.
>> I'm doing some little refactoring in module_sig_check()...
>>
>> [1/2] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
>> [2/2] module: unindent co
On 10/14/20 11:35 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[...]
Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm doing some little refactoring in module_sig_check()...
[1/2] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
[2/2] module:
Hello!
On 14.10.2020 1:44, Joe Perches wrote:
Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm doing some little refactoring in module_sig_check()...
[1/2] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
[2/2] module: unindent comments in modul
bytes of object
code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov
---
kernel/module.c |9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/module.c
===
--- linux.orig/kernel/module.c
+++ linux/
: Sergey Shtylyov
---
kernel/module.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/module.c
===
--- linux.orig/kernel/module.c
+++ linux/kernel/module.c
@@ -2901,10 +2901,11 @@ static int
Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm doing some little refactoring in module_sig_check()...
[1/2] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
[2/2] module: unindent comments in module_sig_check()
Oops, hadn't finished the subject... :-/\
Here are 2 patches against the 'modules-next' branch of Jessica Yu's
'linux.git' repo.
I'm doing some little refactoring in module_sig_check()...
[1/2] module: merge repetitive strings in module_sig_check()
[2/2] module: unindent comments in module_sig_check()
22 matches
Mail list logo