From: Boris Brezillon
Looks like some drivers define MTD names with a colon in it, thus
making mtdpart= parsing impossible. Let's fix the parser to gracefully
handle that case: the last ':' in a partition definition sequence is
considered instead of the first one.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Couldn't the two other transports be implemented ontop of this one using
> a mount helper doing the pipe or tcp setup?
that's how we did it in the version we did for 2.4. I don't see why not.
ron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Only on uniprocessor machines.
Question for the AMD guys: is there a chance of getting
non-proprietary-bios ACPI tables from AMD directly? I.e. ACPI tables as
needed for power-now etc. could be released under GPL, making inclusion
into linuxbios a bit si
if there is any chance of getting along without ACPI entries that is best.
Linux did do this once already, for SMP K8: K8 can boot and run NUMA
without an SRAT table. What more is needed for dual core, and could Linux
support in this area be extended?
ron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> However you'll likely need ACPI for other reasons anyways, e.g. for
> better power saving.
bummer. What the BIOS vendors are doing (to lock in proprietary BIOS, some
say) is making ACPI tables copyright the BIOS vendor, not the motherboard
vendor. So L
Here's the oops. This is an AIC7xxx controller. This is a non-SMP kernel,
and there is only one processor installed in the machine. The value in eax
sure looks weird too me, esp. given that the failing instruction involves
a ld from (%eax)
This is a va2200 node, and this same kernel has booted fi
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Joan Bertran wrote:
> I think so, because I've read somewhere the kernel needs interrupts
> configured, but as kernel configures i8259 I don't know what is necessary,
> the IDT with interrupt service routines ?, sommething special about the chipset ?
I put the following fa
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, I+D wrote:
> I'm trying to boot an AMD Elan520 board without bios
> with kernel 2.4.0-test10 configured for i486 and PCI direct access.
> This kernel boots correctly from HD using the bios provided with the
> evaluation board but kernel 2.4.0-test8 and previous hang
> after
8 matches
Mail list logo
