what are the issues of using procfs in place of ptrace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml
Anyone with information regarding the programming of the Panasonic
CF-W7 embedded laptop controller?
Please?
Thank You in Advance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
whats the difference between:
atomic_inc(&port->count);
and
spin_lock_irq(&port->lock);
++port->count;
spin_unlock_irq(&port->lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vge
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Subject: direct firmware load failure with loadable kernel modules and
userspace firmware loader user helper fallback turned off
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Dec 3 10:18:02 (none
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: mysterious udev segfault
To: Mathias Krause
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Mathias Krause wrote:
>
>
> Probably not. But I don't think the grsec patch ch
Mark Lord wrote:
> Why does link(2) not support hard-linking across bind mount points
> of the same underlying filesystem ?
do we need link(2) at all? bind mounts are supposed to be (hard/soft)
link minus the headaches.
--
Democracy is about two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for dinner.
Ben Crowhurst wrote:
> Loïc Grenié wrote:
>> 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> BPC
>>>
>>
I have tried it in a toy kernel. Oskit style. The code reuse is very
high specially with string ops
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>> The core libc and supporting libraries is the core. and the toolchain
>> the core dev. Those can be updated twice or even once a year. The kernel
>> can be updated once a month if you like.
>>
>
> A new release of the Linux kernel has more than half a million lines of
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
>
>> But the good thing about open source software is that when you believe
>> your ideas are better than what current distributions do you can
>> implement your ideas and create your own distribution.
>>
>
> Haha, the typical FOSS advocate's fallacy. Quote:
>
> “You h
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:51:25PM +, Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
>
>> On 2007-11-12, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think a megafreeze development model is sane. Finding a collection
>>> of software versions that are all known to work together is
Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
>
> Allowing a user to tweak (under constraints) their settings might allow
> them to do something like create two mozilla profiles which are isolated
> from each other, so that the profile they use for general web surfing
> is isolated from the one they use for onli
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current->runtime += 1.0/current->weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i wrote a simple simulator for eevdf. im not sure if i got it right though.
how does eevdf track the runtime usage of a process?
is it supposed to be like this?
int
tick()
{
v_time += 1.0/sum_weights;
current->runtime += 1.0/current->weight;
//sched();
time++;
return 0;
}
i
13 matches
Mail list logo
