I stand corrected. Thanks for clearing that up Andrew.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:and...@lunn.ch]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 11:57 AM
> To: Rodney Cummings
> Cc: Vivien Didelot ;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger
PAUSE, and only for
PAUSE?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:and...@lunn.ch]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 11:48 AM
> To: Rodney Cummings
> Cc: Vivien Didelot ;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> ker...@savoirfairelinux
l for duplication. That topic
has been discussed quite a bit in IEEE 802.
Rodney
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:and...@lunn.ch]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 11:10 AM
> To: Rodney Cummings
> Cc: Vivien Didelot ;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel
I am concerned about this proposed change.
According to IEEE Std 802.1Q, a "higher layer entity" (i.e. end station) that
is internal to the bridge (i.e. switch) can use the same individual global MAC
address that the switch is using. That behavior is common.
Use of a local semi-random MAC addre
4 matches
Mail list logo