Alan Stern wrote:
On the other hand, this proposal involves adding a fair amount of overhead
(all those .owner fields) for a rather small benefit. And it involves
modifying a core kernel subsystem (kernel/module.c). All to prevent
certain unlikely sorts of errors when removing a module -- some
Jiri Kosina wrote:
As this quirk is only needed once in the initialization method, we could
probably get rid of it and just put and explicit test for PID and VID
there (with apropriate comment). We can't afford wasting quirk entries, as
we are slowly running out of them.
Is it a problem of t
Jiri Kosina wrote:
I agree. I am aware of devices for which just inspecting the parsed data
would be OK (some keyboards with usage mappings which are not defined by
HUT, for example), but also of devices which require special handling on
the report level - Robert Marquardt pointed me in a
Jiri Kosina wrote:
In addition to that, as I stated in some previous e-mail, I am currently
working on new 'hidraw' interface, which will provide more flexibility to
userland applications willing to operate on raw HID data, than they
currently have with hiddev.
I do not know too much about t
4 matches
Mail list logo