Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-29 Thread Rob Sims
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:57:01PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:16:36AM -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: > > >From http://www.krose.org/~krose/computing.html: > > > > Since the sky2 driver continues to suck ass (which is a technical > > description for "it hangs all the time under

Re: sky2 PHY setup

2007-05-06 Thread Rob Sims
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:53:48AM -0600, Rob Sims wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: ... > > You might have over run the hub and it wedged. Try doing: > > ethtool -r eth0 > > that forces a down/up > > I'm still seeing

Re: sky2 PHY setup

2007-04-07 Thread Rob Sims
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:24:06 -0600 > Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:16:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > Use ethtool -S to if there are any pause

Re: sky2 PHY setup

2007-03-28 Thread Rob Sims
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:16:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:36:45 -0600 > Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there some debug hooks that can be activated? My sky2 stops > > responding (very light load) about twice a day. The net

Re: sky2 PHY setup

2007-03-16 Thread Rob Sims
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:59:32AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:29:12 +0100 > Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello Stephen, > > > > > yesterday I pulled from Linus tree because I saw the sky2 updated and I > > > tried to break it but it seems that my

Re: Change in NFS client behavior

2005-09-07 Thread Rob Sims
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:19:07AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > fr den 02.09.2005 Klokka 00:15 (-0400) skreiv Trond Myklebust: > > > Sure. The other problem is that the test is made before the i_sem is > > grabbed. OK, so how about the appended patch instead? > > Doh! > > Trond > VFS/NFS: Fi

Re: Change in NFS client behavior

2005-09-02 Thread Rob Sims
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:43:17PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > to den 01.09.2005 Klokka 19:38 (-0400) skreiv Trond Myklebust: > > This is a consequence of 2.6 NFS clients optimising away unnecessary > > truncate calls. Whereas this is correct behaviour for truncate(), it > > appears to be incor

Change in NFS client behavior

2005-08-31 Thread Rob Sims
We have noticed when changing from kernel 2.4.23 to 2.6.8 that timestamps of files are not changed if opened for a write and nothing is written. When using 2.4.23 timestamps are changed. When using a local filesystem (reiserfs) with either kernel, timestamps are changed. Symptoms vary with the cl