Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.0.0-rc4

2014-05-21 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-05-20 20:24, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Fixes since v1.9 series > --- > > Unless otherwise noted, all the fixes since v1.9 in the maintenance > track are contained in this release (see the maintenance releases' > notes for details). [...] > > * The shell prompt script (in

Re: [PATCH] mm: msync: require either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC

2014-04-03 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-04-03 04:25, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > [CC += Peter Zijlstra] > [CC += bug-readl...@gnu.org -- maintainers, it _may_ be desirable to > fix your msync() call] I didn't see bug-readl...@gnu.org in the CC list -- did you forget to add them, or were they BCC'd? >> * Clearer inten

Re: [PATCH] mm: msync: require either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC

2014-04-02 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-04-02 07:45, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 04:10 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Richard Hansen wrote: >>> For the flags parameter, POSIX says "Either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC shall >&g

Re: [PATCH] mm: msync: require either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC

2014-04-01 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2014-04-01 15:32, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Richard, > > On 04/01/2014 08:25 PM, Richard Hansen wrote: >> For the flags parameter, POSIX says "Either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC shall >> be specified, but not both." [1] There was already a test for the >

[PATCH] mm: msync: require either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC

2014-04-01 Thread Richard Hansen
written in man-pages.git) is silent on the behavior if both flags are unset, so this change should not break an application written by somone who carefully reads the Linux man pages or the POSIX spec. [1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/msync.html Signed-off-by: Richard

Re: [PATCH] fuse: Fix IOC_[GS]ETFLAGS argument size brokenness

2013-12-20 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2013-12-19 18:27, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > The IOC_[GS]ETFLAGS ioctls, despite being defined to take a "long" > parameter, actually take "int" parameters. FUSE unfortunately assumed > that the ioctl definitions never lie, and transfers a long's worth of > data in and out of userspace, which cau

Re: [PATCH] fuse: Fix IOC_[GS]ETFLAGS argument size brokenness

2013-12-19 Thread Richard Hansen
On 2013-12-19 18:27, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > The IOC_[GS]ETFLAGS ioctls, despite being defined to take a "long" > parameter, actually take "int" parameters. FUSE unfortunately assumed > that the ioctl definitions never lie, and transfers a long's worth of > data in and out of userspace, which cau

[PATCH] mm: msync: require either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC

2013-09-01 Thread Richard Hansen
written in man-pages.git) is silent on the behavior if both flags are unset, so this change should not break an application written by somone who carefully reads the Linux man pages or the POSIX spec. [1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/msync.html Signed-off-by: Richard