On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 01:00:15PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:42:53 +0200, Remi Turk wrote:
>
> Try the patch below. Reboot. Run 'apm -S' (or --standby) at the
> console. Did you see output from both send_event and apic_pm_callback?
> If so
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Remi Turk wrote:
>
> By applying the following patch (lookalike)?
>
> arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:send_event():
>
> case APM_SYS_SUSPEND:
> case APM_CRITICAL_SUSPEND:
> case APM_USER_SUSPEND:
> + case APM
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 06:48:32AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
>
> > This is completely bogus. I am not saying that I can't afford the swap.
> > What I am saying is that it is completely broken to require this amount
> > of swap given the boundaries of ef
Hi,
it seems the Configure.help text for CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE
is incorrect: The default is to stall until the printer
is ready while the help text says the opposite.
(vi +540 drivers/char/lp.c)
Attached is a patch for 2.4.6-pre1 which fixes the help text.
Also, shouldn't CONFIG_LP_CONSOLE depend on
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 09:37:52PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 2.4.5-ac[4678] all lock hard (no sysreq) when pushing my
> > power-button (setup from the bios to go to standby) or
> > when running apm --standby. (apm version 3.0final, RH6.2)
> > apm --suspend works the way it should.
> >
> > 2.4.5/
Hi,
2.4.5-ac[4678] all lock hard (no sysreq) when pushing my
power-button (setup from the bios to go to standby) or
when running apm --standby. (apm version 3.0final, RH6.2)
apm --suspend works the way it should.
2.4.5/2.4.6-pre1 don't hardlock.
lspci -vvxxx output and .config are attached.
Any
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 07:25:25AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> BTW, bind and friends are also easy - it's
> what = open(old, 0);
> where = open(mountpoint, 0);
> new_mount(where, MNT_BIND, what);
>
> Comments?
What if `what' and or `where' aren't directories but e.g. sockets
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> >> It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not require new
> >> syscalls/ioctls and can be accessed from user space without specifically
> >> compiled programs. You can use shell scripts, java, command line etc.
>
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Q: Is it possible to union mount file systems in linux 2.4 (currently
>using 2.4.5)?
>
> Q: Should I just go home and start doing my homework?
>
> Best regards
>
> roy
AFAIK Al Viro is working on a patch, but it's not
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Remi Turk]
> > Do I understand correctly that this means hardlinks to directories
> > (except . and ..) are fundamentally impossible in Linux?
>
> Why do you want to be able to do that? Use symlinks or loopback mounts
> and stay out
Hi,
Long long ago, (March 2000) Alexander Viro replied to Pavel Machek:
>> Am I right that from now on each process can have completely different
>> view of filesystem like in plan9?
>
>Almost there ;-) And yes, the only thing we lack for proper namespaces is
>the union-directories (clone() bit i
Remi Turk wrote:
> > Ok, the problem is that you have an interrupt router table for your Ali
> > 1533, but no interrupt router entry for your IDE device. That's why
> > pci_enable_device is failing.
> >
> > Would you mind testing two kernel patches for me?
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Attached below is a message I just sent to someone else who is having
> the same problem as you. Would it be possible for you to try the stuff
> I suggest in the message as well?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
> Subject: Re: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 00
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Remi Turk wrote:
> >
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, after fixing a bad interaction where the Web server was trying to
> > > run dump_pirq as a CGI script, dump_pirq can be retrieved from
> > >
>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Remi Turk wrote:
> > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
> > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
> > idebus=xx
> > ALI15X3: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 78
> > PCI: No IRQ known for inter
Hi,
I just saw this warning when booting:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
idebus=xx
ALI15X3: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 78
PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 00:0f.0. Please try
using pci=biosi
Hi folks,
when booting pre5 I got a crc-error while uncompressing
the kernel this morning. (/usr/src/linux/lib/inflate.c:1166 AFAICS)
Rebooting didn't trigger it again and it's the first time I ever saw it.
I've never had any SIG11 problems while compiling kernels so I wouldn't
expect bad RAM. (N
17 matches
Mail list logo
