RE: temperature standard - global config option?

Jonathan Morton wrote: > I should instead write 59 ±2°C, since that is the most precision > I can possibly know it to. With some advanced measuring techniques > it *may* be acceptable to write 59.43 ±2°C *at most*, and then only > if you really know why you need the extra information. It's easy

RE: TRG vger.timpanogas.org hacked

Bind 8.2.4 was released on May 17th, with the standard comment "BIND 8.2.4 is the latest version of ISC BIND 8. We strongly recommend that you upgrade to BIND 9.1 or, if that is not immediately possible, to BIND 8.2.4 due to certain security vulnerabilities in previous versions." However, there a

RE: hotmail not dealing with ECN

James Sutherland wrote: > Except you can't retry without ECN, because DaveM wants to do > a Microsoft and force ECN on everyone, whether they like it > or not. If ECN is so wonderful, why doesn't anybody actually > WANT to use it anyway? And there's the rub. Whether ECN is wonderful or not, at