On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > The error message:
> >
> > [Fri Feb 16 13:42:13 2018] i2c-thunderx :01:09.4: unhandled state: 0
> >
> > is mis-leading as state 0 (bus error) is not an unknown state.
> >
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:53:32PM +0200, Lukasz Odzioba wrote:
> > A new limit selected arbitrarily as power of two greater than
> > required minimum for Xeon Phi processor.
> Why 128 instead of a more reasonable 64 ? What is the required
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Phil Pokorny
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Dan Williams
>>> wrote:
>>>> +config ND
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Dan Williams
> wrote:
>> +config ND_E820
>> + tristate "E820: Support the E820-type-12 PMEM convention"
>> + depends on X86_PMEM_LEGACY
>> + default m if X86_PMEM_LEGACY
>> + selec
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski
wrote:
>
> Searching for the member of an array closest to 'x' is
> duplicated in several places.
>
> Add two macros that implement this algorithm for arrays
> sorted both in ascending and descending order.
I don't see the point here. You're n
5 matches
Mail list logo