On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:41:28AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> some architectures don't care at all, because verify_area is a noop
> (sparc64).
Why (and how) is this?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: se
Hello,
For 2.4 kernels, how is memory between 1G and 4G used ? Is it only for
cache/buffers or it is also offered to processes ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
s window :xxx:xx. Bad, what else
can I say?" which I understand are harmless)
Let me know if anyone needs more info/tests/etc.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel
Hello,
What is the impact of enabling ECN on the server side ? I mean, will
any clients (with broken firewalls) be affected if a SMTP/HTTP server
has ECN enabled ?
On the other hand, is there any advantage with ECN enabled on the server
side ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hello,
Is it possible to bind a raw device to a software RAID 1 array ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read
Hello,
For a RAID1 array built of two disks on two separate SCSI controllers,
are the reads balanced between the two controllers (for higher speed) ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:21:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet
> > with bad csum was fragmented".
>
> OK, last experiment :-) Add this patch, and watch to s
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:21:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet
> > with bad csum was fragmented".
>
> OK, last experiment :-) Add this patch, and watch to s
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:10:03PM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Petru Paler writes:
> > > > Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
> > > > time the UDP bad cs
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > > Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
> > > time the UDP bad csum message appears, tell me if it says "UDP packet
> > > with bad csu
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:58:54AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Ok. Should I keep reporting new syslog messages as they appear ?
>
> Not the "Undo ***" and "Disorder ***" ones".
Ok.
> But this one
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:33:26AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > I get messages in syslog looking like:
> >
> > Undo loss 192.147.174.183/59953 c2 l0 ss2/65535 p0
> > Undo loss 63.148.232.53/4423 c2 l0 ss2/2 p0
> > Undo loss
don't think either Postfix or tinydns (the main load) are using
sendfile().
The machine is stable so far, but it's been up for only 15 minutes.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:19:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
> > storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
> > exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > - struct dqblk d;
> > + struct dqblk32 d;
>
> What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
> it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
> the
old_fs;
char *spec;
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
; on keeping it single-threaded - unless someone can tell me that's a bad
> idea)
Keep it single threaded if you run on UP only...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 04:53:40PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
> > This is one of the main thttpd design points: run in a select() loop. Since
> > it is intended for mainly static workloads, it performs quite well..
or mainly static workloads, it performs quite well...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
?
Should I be worried about it or it's ok ?
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
>From: Petru Paler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>So should I apply your patch ?
>
> Yes, this new
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
>From: Petru Paler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>So should I apply your patch ?
>
> Yes, this new OOPS you've sent me is in the same place.
Ok, appl
g what data is available
>>PC; 00449e94<=
>>O7; 00449f14
>>I7; 0044cfa8
3 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable.
So should I apply your patch ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
Let me know if you need additional info or testing done.
Bug report (in standard format):
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Repeated kernel oopses, after a while of functioning under
heavy load.
[2.] Full description of the probl
23 matches
Mail list logo
