/0x57c
[38261.677409] [] do_signal+0x534/0x550
[38261.682608] [] do_notify_resume+0x20/0x58
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Nesterov [mailto:o...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:58 PM
To: Peter Chiang
Cc: ccr...@android.com; lize...@huawei.com; a...@linux-foundation.org;
t
Is it possible before exit_mm() set tsk->mm to NULL, tsk->mm has already been
NULL ?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Chiang
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:31 PM
To: Peter Chiang; ccr...@android.com; lize...@huawei.com;
a...@linux-foundation.org; o...@redhat.com; t...@kernel.o
mm_update_next_owner() call from exit_mm() , and exit_mm() change tsk->mm to
NULL
If p==c , It seems to be impossible that mm == c->mm (tsk->mm) . Because mm
is non-NULL and c->mm is NULL .
-Original Message-
From: Peter Chiang [mailto:pchi...@nvidia.com]
Sent: Wedn
From: pchiang
Fix kernel panic when finding a new owner for the mm
and the new owner is equal to current onwer
Signed-off-by: pchiang
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 6ed6a1d..aa98422 100644
--- a/kernel/e
4 matches
Mail list logo