[OT] high precision hardware (was Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt)

2005-07-15 Thread Paul Jakma
's difficult to do (eg looked at some ARM microcontrollers, which still have several usec of interrupt latency - even with no OS, still likely cant use timers and interrupts.). regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: The church sav

Re: Ethernet driver link state propagation to ip stack

2005-01-15 Thread Paul Jakma
h were very rare back in 2.2 days, dont think there was a unified way to report these events to userspace either. Sincerely, Jyri Põldre. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: Sailors in ships, sail on! Even while we died, others rode out the storm.

Re: problem found (was Re: [PATCH] Single user linux)

2001-04-25 Thread Paul Jakma
hi imel, On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > problem is you guys are to unix-centric, try to be user-centric a little. with all respect: the problem is that you do not listen. as people keep trying to point out to you: - you can have your single-user centric user environment (no lo

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [repost] Announce: Linux-OpenLVM mailing list

2001-04-19 Thread Paul Jakma
u consider the lobbying that went on to try persuade l-k that LVM should go in. > Cheers, Andreas obHiddenCode: lm-sensors... used to use this a long time ago. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/ja

Re: uninteruptable sleep (D state => load_avrg++)

2001-04-04 Thread Paul Jakma
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, christophe barbe wrote: > From me, a POV without technical reasons is not a philosical one > but more certainly an historical one. there may be (and indeed probably are) good technical reasons, however i am not well enough informed to say what they are. > Process that will b

Re: uninteruptable sleep (D state => load_avrg++)

2001-04-04 Thread Paul Jakma
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, christophe barbe wrote: > The sleep should certainly be interruptible and I that's what I > said to the GFS guy. But what the reason to increment the load > average for each D process ? from a philosical POV: they are processes that will be runnable as soon as the kernel retu

Re: Serial, 115Kbps, 2.2, 2.4

2001-04-01 Thread Paul Jakma
should be) Try hdparm -u on all your IDE disks... should improve things. > Later, > Tom regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: What I want is all of the power

Re: Larger dev_t

2001-03-27 Thread Paul Jakma
oesn't start then i still have a fully functional /dev. but anyway... there seems to be loads of scope to do lots of different things with devfsd, plus NIS support. :) regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

2001-03-23 Thread Paul Jakma
ld be forgotten for good and all. :) > Szaka regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman August

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

2001-03-23 Thread Paul Jakma
mode, cause linux does not have the accounting to cover it... solution according to more knowledgable folks than i, sysadmin, is better accounting so that vm_enough_memory can be more accurate rather than developing an all-seeing oom_killer(). > Andries regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

2001-03-23 Thread Paul Jakma
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > About the "use resource limits!". Yes, this is one solution. The > *expensive* solution (admin time, worse resource utilization, etc). traditional user limits have worse resource utilisation? think what kind of utilisation a guaranteed allocation

Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init

2001-03-23 Thread Paul Jakma
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Guest section DW wrote: > But yes, I am complaining because Linux by default is unreliable. no, your distribution is unreliable by default. > I strongly prefer a system that is reliable by default, > and I'll leave it to others to run it in an unreliable mode. currently, s

Re: Running Bind 9 on Redhat 7

2001-02-19 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Ansari wrote: > Hi !! > > I am configuring Bind 9 on Redhat 7 but unable to start the named. > Here is my /var/log message log: you have a config problem i think. > Feb 20 09:49:58 ns2 named[2005]: loading zones: no ttl you need to put: $TTL at the beginning of each zon

Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation...

2001-02-19 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Henning P . Schmiedehausen wrote: > So, is it legal to put changes to a twin licensed driver in the Linux > kernel tree back into the same driver in the BSD tree? IANAL, but AIUI: if the changes are made the copyright holder then they may do whatever they want. (release the

Re: [LK] Re: lkml subject line

2001-02-15 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > If the above procmail filter doesn't work (untested) let me know > and I will MAKE it work. Windows users - tough luck - procmail > is open source - hire someone to port it... and even windows users can filter properly. netscape allows you to add cus

Re: [OT] Re: 2.4.x, drm, g400 and pci_set_master

2001-02-08 Thread Paul Jakma
replying to myself.. On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Paul Jakma wrote: > why put in mga specific code? last time i asked why 2x74x hardware iommu wasn't supported i was told something along the lines of cause generic kernel driver interfaces wouldn't support it. so support for the alpha h

Re: [OT] Re: 2.4.x, drm, g400 and pci_set_master

2001-02-08 Thread Paul Jakma
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alex Deucher wrote: > There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe > some people have had some success with it. but there doesn't need to be. DEC 2x17x Alpha chipsets have an IOMMU for hardware scatter-gather support. (ie generic agpgart for the PCI bu

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-06 Thread Paul Jakma
ce this second pipe patch. will give it whirl. thanks neil. > NeilBrown > > regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-05 Thread Paul Jakma
ecific issues. IME if you have a good network connection and you don't need IRIX to be diskless hanging off a Linux NFS server then NFSv3 works extremely well. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://ww

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink

2001-02-02 Thread Paul Jakma
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > You can do: > if [ "$CC" = gcc ]; then > echo 'inline void f(unsigned int n){int >i,j=-1;for(i=0;i<10&&j<0;i++)if((1UL< > test.c > gcc -O2 -o test test.c > if ./test; then echo "*** Please don't use this compiler to compile kernel"; fi > rm -f t

Re: routing between different subnets on same if.

2001-01-27 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > What about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter ? Should be zero > for the 192.* interface(s), I think. > i already have that enabled for security purposes helaas. > Mike. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMA

Re: routing between different subnets on same if.

2001-01-27 Thread Paul Jakma
i don't, but i don't see what i'm supposed to do with the 'ip' command? different scope or realm? or ... ?? > Mike. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt -

Re: routing between different subnets on same if.

2001-01-27 Thread Paul Jakma
so it'd make no difference. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: The greatest productive force is human selfishness. -- Robert Heinlein - T

routing between different subnets on same if.

2001-01-27 Thread Paul Jakma
i'm trying to get linux to do routing between 2 different subnets that are on the same physical interface, because windows hosts don't seem to accept the redirects. how do i do it? how do i get linux to fully route between these subnets on behalf of clients? turn send_redirects off doesn't work,

Re: Is this kernel related (signal 11)?

2001-01-22 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote: > Evidence: I recently had a bad 128MB SDRAM which *always* failed at byte > address 0x220068, and X is likely to be the biggest process by far on a box, so statistically will be the process that hits this bad byte the most. no? regards, -- Paul

Re: 2.4 and ipmasq modules

2001-01-20 Thread Paul Jakma
x27;m half in the middle of porting ip_masq_icq, > but it's one hideously ugly kludge after another. Such is life. > uhmm... ICQ seems to work fine through connection tracking for me, so is there a need for a special ip_masq_icq module? > d regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROT

Re: [linux-lvm] Oops in 2.4.0 (@ LVM)

2001-01-10 Thread Paul Jakma
for users. > Cheers, Andreas > regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt. -- Herbe

Re: [linux-lvm] Oops in 2.4.0 (@ LVM)

2001-01-10 Thread Paul Jakma
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > You should also get the LVM user tools from CVS (with TAG LVM_0-9-patches) > to solve this problem. There will hopefully be a new LVM release soon. any word on when the kernel fixes are going to linus? -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Abysmal RAID 0 performance on 2.4.0-test10 for IDE?

2000-12-27 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ian Stirling wrote: > The PCI bus can move around 130MB/sec, in bursts yes, but sustained data bandwidth of PCI is a lot lower, maybe 30 to 50MB/s. And you won't get sustained RAID performance > sustained PCI performance. > Anyway, in clarification, Rik mentioned that two r

reliable oops in test12: kswapd: submit_bh

2000-12-21 Thread Paul Jakma
first symbol Code; 0007 Before first symbol 7: 68 7f 03 00 00push $0x37f Code; 000c Before first symbol c: 68 a2 f9 1d c0push $0xc01df9a2 Code; 0011 Before first symbol 11: 68 05 f7 00 00 push $0xf705 -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROT

Re: via82cxxx_audio - bad latency

2000-12-13 Thread Paul Jakma
s is the gnome mixer, as is asmixer. (ie everything to do with esd or /dev/sound). soon as i SIGSTOP the playing app all the other apps come back to life. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma

Re: via82cxxx_audio - bad latency

2000-12-13 Thread Paul Jakma
all apps that are holding any /dev/sound/ devices open become unresponive. xmms, asmixer, mpg123, esd, etc.. etc.. > Nils > regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune

via82cxxx_audio - bad latency

2000-12-12 Thread Paul Jakma
hi, i think somethings gone wrong with via82cxxx_audio. Playing anything through it seems to cause massive latency in apps like xmms, esd, asmixer, etc.. anything to do with playing or mixer levels suddenly takes a minute or more to respond. It didn't always do this, and when it started happenin

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > No idea on the sensors stuff i'll go nag them again. :) regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: You will lose an i

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Jakma
keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to l-k that they'd started a sensors project, and had code for the LM80. he wasn't at all aware of lm_sensors!). regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi

Re: Enviromental Monitoring

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Jakma
y/ would much rather keep themselves and their code isolated in some god forsaken CVS server rather than submit their code to Linus. fscking shame. -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ---

Re: Serial Console

2000-12-05 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Steve Hill wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, PaulJakma wrote: > > > how? symlink to /dev/ttyS0, or with console=ttyS0 boot option? > > console=ttyS0 > > Nope, /dev/console *does* block. very weird.. the reason i replied to you, even though i have no direct experience of serial con

Re: Serial Console

2000-12-05 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Steve Hill wrote: > > I'm building boxes with the console set to /dev/ttyS0. how? symlink to /dev/ttyS0, or with console=ttyS0 boot option? > However, I can't > guarantee that there will always be a term plugged into the serial > port. If there is no term on the port, event

Re: IP fragmentation (DF) and ip_no_pmtu_disc in 2.2 vs 2.4

2000-12-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Intel PXE uses tftp to download boot images and discards IP packets with > > the DF bit set; so a tftpd server on 2.4 with the default > > Then Intel PXE is buggy and you should go spank whoever provided > it as well as doing the workarounds. Supporting rec

Re: problem with hp C1537A tape drives

2000-11-26 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Phil Randal wrote: > Ah, have you tried cleaning the tape heads? > the drive gets a run of a cleaning tape on a weekly basis. > far more frequently than you'd expect. I've found it needs > two cleaning tape passes to clear this one. > uhmmm ok. I've now done multiple

Re: problem with hp C1537A tape drives

2000-11-26 Thread Paul Jakma
Ooops.. yes.. that info might have been useful. :) The box is a Compaq PL3000. Chipset is the onboard Sym 53c876, driven by the ncr53c8xx driver. Drive is external. Kernel is RH6.2 default 2.2.14-5.0smp. On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > Hello Paul , Could you add

problem with hp C1537A tape drives

2000-11-26 Thread Paul Jakma
there a known problem with SCSI tape drives? or with HP DDS-3 drives? What does the kernel error message mean? (it's all 0's so not much i guess). What is a "Data Phase error"? thanks in advance, Paul Jakma. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: crash @ 64 day's of uptime

2000-11-10 Thread Paul Jakma
, 0.29, 0.20 [paulj@berkman paulj]$ rpm -q redhat-release redhat-release-6.2-1 you don't have a cleaner coming in every 64 days do you? :) groetjes, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: Neve

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

2000-11-09 Thread Paul Jakma
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > Well, then, problem solved. > :) > > afaik linus allows binary modules in most cases. > > And since an "Advanced Linux Kernel Project" wouldn't be a Linus kernel, > what then? Would they have the same discretion as Linus? Would Linus' > exception

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI)

2000-11-09 Thread Paul Jakma
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > Why? I think the IBM GKHI code would be of tremendous value. It would > make the kernel much more flexible, and for users, much more friendly. > No more patch-and-recompile to add a filesystem or whatever. There's no > reason to hamstring their effort

Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

2000-11-06 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Its called modules.conf. It has all these nice preload directives in it cool.. doesn't seem to be documented though in modutils 2.3.17. what exactly does it do? regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.

Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

2000-11-06 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Which is part of what persistent module data lets you do. And without having > to mess with dont_screw_with_mixer (which if you get it wrong btw can be > fatal and hang the hardware) > the sound card case for persistent modules is contentious i think. wha

Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

2000-11-06 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: > No. You should initialise the hardware completely when the driver is > reloaded. and it is. just that 'mixer levels' are subjective - different users have different tastes. in what way does: - init to mute - user set to liking fail people? (sound

Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

2000-11-06 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > If the sound card is only used some of the time or setup and then used > for TV its nice to get the 60K + 128K DMA buffer back when you dont need it > especially on a low end box > so unload it then - aiui most soundcards will continue passing through the T

Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page]

2000-11-06 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: > * Sound module is autoloaded again, default to zero levels. so you use the 'post-install' option of modules.conf to run your mixer-level setting script. > This time it is _NOT_ fine. User is rightly pissed off :) > even better: is there any

Re: scsi-cdrom lockup and ide-scsi problem (both EFS related)

2000-10-31 Thread Paul Jakma
om is fixed then ide-scsi should work too? > > Yup how far down the TODO list is it? (to this user anyway it's important). thanks for the answers jens, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt ---

Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10

2000-10-31 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Less Critical: > Does autofs4 work yet has been apparently working fine for me for a while on 2.4test and 2.2+patch. (while==not noticed any major problems in last couple of months) > Alan regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: scsi-cdrom lockup and ide-scsi problem (both EFS related)

2000-10-31 Thread Paul Jakma
driver. As you noted, pure ATAPI drive will > work just fine. > so once the scsi cdrom is fixed then ide-scsi should work too? > rmmod ide-scsi ; insmod ide-cd > mount, etc > rmmod ide-cd ; insmod ide-scsi > burn > didn't think this was possible. will try that. thanks

scsi-cdrom lockup and ide-scsi problem (both EFS related)

2000-10-31 Thread Paul Jakma
sion: 02 Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: CREATIVE Model: CD2422E MC102 Rev: 1.02 Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02 please contact me if you need further debugging info. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie

test10-pre5: netfilter compile error

2000-10-26 Thread Paul Jakma
#x27;: netfilter.c:545: `NF_MAX_HOOKS' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [netfilter.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/misc/src/linux/net/core' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/misc/src/linux/net/core' make[1]: *** [_subdir_co

Re: Minimizing dropped UDP packets

2000-10-25 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Frank Hansen wrote: > Looking at the timestamps, it seems that the packets is dropped mainly > when the disk task calls 'write' in order to flush the buffer to disk. > have you tried enabling dma, unmask irq and 32bit io with hdparm? (i once had problems with a serial ppp

Re: test10-pre nfs compile failure

2000-10-22 Thread Paul Jakma
ok... looks like a patch went wrong at some point. (or i forgot to remove a patch from Trond from a little while ago). apologies, Paul Jakma. On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Mark Hahn wrote: > > i've gotten the following message the last 2 times i've tried to > > compile the

test10-pre nfs compile failure

2000-10-22 Thread Paul Jakma
ctory `/misc/src/linux-2.4.0/fs/nfs' make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_nfs] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/misc/src/linux-2.4.0/fs' make: *** [_mod_fs] Error 2 does anyone know what this could be? (i've done a make mrproper). regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-17 Thread Paul Jakma
> For my own system : I don't care. But I can imagine that there are people > out there that do care about these kind of issues. > but the point is that though most cards hold firmware on a PROM, a few hold the firmware in the driver. firmware in PROM, firmware in driver... what's the differen

Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &OOM handler)

2000-10-11 Thread Paul Jakma
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bruce A. Locke wrote: > I wasn't aware PAM settings affected daemons started up during boottime > but I will check into it, thank you. > daemons generally don't need to be PAM aware (unless they deal with authorising things). The script that launches it however (if started

Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &OOM handler)

2000-10-11 Thread Paul Jakma
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bruce A. Locke wrote: > > Your making the deadly assumption that all applications behave themselves > exactly the same all the time. Oops... netscape decided to freak out and > take up all your memory... guess its the admins fault. Oops... some > mod_perl script decided to

Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

2000-10-09 Thread Paul Jakma
o the designer of the router floppy to get his stuff right. the one thing that is clear from the many OOM flamewars is that no OOM reaper algorithm will satisfy 100% of conditions 100% of the time. So all Rik can do is optimise for the common case. (roll on beancounting and proper resource limiti

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-12 Thread Paul Jakma
lity, and wait for 2.4 to get stable. we await 2.219pre1 with much curiosity. :) regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: Where you stand depends on where you sit. -- Ruf

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-12 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > ..so it should be at least as well tested as the USB backport in 2.2.18preX, > > if not more so? Or so is implied. :) > > This is the big clue most people are missing > > 2.2.17- USB devices do not work > 2.2.18- USB

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-12 Thread Paul Jakma
but a vast improvement. anyway... i've gone hoarse now. better stop. :) regards, Paul Jakma - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-12 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > Shrug. So you want me to make it worse by shipping unproven code in a way > I can't test it ? > the code is in 2.4 and has been tested there though. the patches are a backport of the 2.4 code. --paulj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-12 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I hear that the new NFS patch is "better and more stable" etc. but no > details. hard to give details as i havn't used unpatched linux 2.2 nfs in a very long time. best evidence from me is anecdotal: linux 2.4 / 2.2 nfs patches works perfectly for me (li

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4

2000-09-11 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > escape Linux 2.2.xx NFS. This is kind of serious, you know? yep. it is serious. we've been begging for knfsd to be updated to the most /current/ code for quite a while a now. I searched the archives and i found a post of mine asking alan to conside

Re: Availability of kdb

2000-09-10 Thread Paul Jakma
omers. > contrary to his development philosophy, so it's probably a > complete waste of my time. > linux kernel hackers do the worrying about 'goodness' but there is *nothing* that stops commerce adding tweaks to help with support issues! (RedHat/SuSE/etc kernels are heavi

Re: Availability of kdb

2000-09-06 Thread Paul Jakma
rd kernel is pure. you're happy cause your field reps in the event of a crash can tell you "this exact bit here was fubar'ed." whereupon you may apply the Ingo/Al/Linus/David patented MKDB method. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMA

Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility

2000-09-05 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, David Luyer wrote: > So if I want it to work I most likely need to make the ARP request ignore > the higher level bindings of the socket. > or just set a route pointing net d.e.f to ethX. > David. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-05 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: > Someone has sent a dodgy message to bugtraq. Delete > the mailbox or open it in an editor and look for the > header line that's a lot longer than the others. > that wasn't enough for me. i ended up deleting most of the emails to bugtraq from sep 1

Re: test8-pre4: innd fixed?

2000-09-05 Thread Paul Jakma
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The mailbox corruption thread is at least partly due to a pine bug that is > triggered by a bugtraq posting. > confirmed: it is due to multi-line X-Keyword headers (as contained in a recent posting to bugtraq). The bug is in wu c-client, used by pine

Re: test8-pre2 fs corruption?

2000-09-03 Thread Paul Jakma
think i have fs corruption. (the bugtraq folder is on nfs on a 2.2 server). Perhaps rather than fs corruption, your problem (and mine) is that someone sent a bogey message to bugtraq? regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jak

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre1

2000-09-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On 1 Sep 2000, Matthias Andree wrote: > Does including knfsd v3 break v2? Is not NFS v3 a compile-time option? I > would not object if it was tagged "EXPERIMENTAL". it is. asui the NFS patches are bugfixes/improvements on the existing stock V2 knfsd, and the feature add v3 is pretty much indepe

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre1

2000-09-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > I'd love to have raid 0.90, nfsv3 and the new ide stuff in but I > cannot see a path for that without breaking a supposedly stable > product for other people which is simply not acceptable. > raid i can understand considering it's a 'no way back' thing. the

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre1

2000-08-31 Thread Paul Jakma
; you don't any more, so they actaully improve compatability). > cool. another reason to include the patches. > NeilBrown > > -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: I try to kee

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre1

2000-08-31 Thread Paul Jakma
teroperability benefits of the the patches. regards, -- Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt --- Fortune: "Are you sure you're not an encyclopedia salesman?" No, Ma&

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-08-31 Thread Paul Jakma
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Robert Greimel wrote: > It would be nice if "make modules_install" would automatically copy System.map > to /lib/modules// . > as well as .config to /lib/modules//config. (i had to meant to write .config not System.map originally as that is what the thread is about... doh!

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-08-31 Thread Paul Jakma
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Paul Jakma wrote: > May i suggest the following: > > cp System.map /boot/System.map- or even better cp to /lib/modules// and fix the tools to look there if they don't do already. --paulj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l