Hello,
I am suffering from the following (usb-related?) problem:
I have several different mashines - all x86 architecture - just lets
call them mashineA, mashineB and mashineC.
Anyway, mashineA has a severe problem with a
Kingston-USB-pendrive(2gig). I simply cant install anything on it - the
Remove an empty and thus unused definition of 'setup_nr_node_ids' (in
case of MAX_NUMNODES < 1) in order to resolve a compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Ringl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.20-o/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-03-22 23:11:25.0 +0100
Hello,
[ ... Fixed two minor typos. ...]
The following patch (it's also attached tho) is against 2.6.21-rc5 :
--- linux-2.6.20-o/drivers/block/Kconfig2007-03-18 00:04:53.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/block/Kconfig 2007-03-25 03:35:19.0 +0200
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@
Hello,
[ ... fixed one minor typo and adapted the word order ... ]
--- linux-2.6.20-o/drivers/isdn/capi/Kconfig2007-03-18
00:04:54.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/isdn/capi/Kconfig2007-03-25
04:10:24.0 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
help
If you say Y here, the ker
Hello,
[ ... Fixed two minor typos. ...]
The following patch is against 2.6.21-rc4:
--- linux-2.6.20-o/drivers/block/Kconfig2007-03-18 00:04:53.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.20/drivers/block/Kconfig 2007-03-25 03:35:19.0 +0200
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@
default "16"
Hello,
this is just a QA / cosmetic fix .. nevertheless the documentation about
modules / drivers should be appropriate to the great work of those who
write all the real important stuff. :-)
The following patch is against 2.6.21-rc4:
--- linux-2.6.20-o/drivers/block/Kconfig2007-03-18 00
Hello,
this is just a QA / cosmetic fix .. nevertheless the documentation about
modules / drivers should be appropriate to the great work of those who
write all the real important stuff. :-)
The following patch is against 2.6.21-rc4:
--- /root/dev/linux-2.6.20-o/net/ieee80211/Kconfig2007
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Patrick Ringl wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hello,
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Patrick Ringl wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
since especially Serial ATA has it's own menu point now, I guess we can
chang
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hello,
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Patrick Ringl wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
since especially Serial ATA has it's own menu point now, I guess we can
change the description of the deprecated SATA driver as well, since the
new libATA subsystem is not configured thro
Hello,
since especially Serial ATA has it's own menu point now, I guess we can
change the description of the deprecated SATA driver as well, since the
new libATA subsystem is not configured through a SCSI low-level driver
anymore, but has it's own menu point.
The following patch is against 2.
Hello,
since Serial ATA has it's own menu point now, I guess we can change the
description of the deprecated SATA driver as well, since the new S-ATA
subsystem is not configured through a SCSI low-level driver anymore.
The following patch is against 2.6.21-rc3:
--- linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/ide/
Hello,
since Serial ATA has it's own menu point now, I guess we can change the
description of the deprecated SATA driver as well, since the new S-ATA
subsystem is not configured through a SCSI low-level driver anymore.
The following patch is against 2.6.21-rc3:
--- linux-2.6.20.orig/drivers/i
12 matches
Mail list logo