[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0b054e1..bd0fa0e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1526,6 +1526,8 @@ W: http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/
Patch from Steve which I've vetted and tested:
"This patch is really intended has a move towards fixing the sendmsg/recvmsg
functions in various ways so that we will finally have working nagle. Also
reduces code duplication. "
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield &l
set to NULL (esentially preventing
>>any more DECnet packets being received on that device) before flushing all
>>neighbours and only then releasing dn_db.
>
>
> I agree that the window is quite small, but suppose that the
I'm having trouble getting bootpd to work on 2.4 kernels - the messages get
sent out onto the network but my DEC machines (Alpha 3000/300 and a
DECstation 2100) don't like them. It works fine on 2.2.19.
There's obviously nothing fundamentally wrong with the Linux server because it
can boot anoth
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:09:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> AJ Lewis wrote:
> > Ok, the issue here is that we're trying to get a release out and so anything
> > that majorly changes the code is getting shunted aside for the moment. It
> > would be stupid to just add everything that comes in on
The patch below fixes the ioctl32.c file so that LVM 0.9 will work on UltraSPARC
machines.
As LVM 0.9 has been in the kernel since 2.4.0 please consider for inclusion in
the standard Linux kernel.
There are further changes needed for LVM to work on UltraSPARC machines, these
are in the 0.9.1beta
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:43:23PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Anton, you write:
> > > Have a look at 2.4, arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c
> >
> > Yuk.
> >
> > > Would it be possible to clean up the ioctl interface so we don
7 matches
Mail list logo
