Re: static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?

2001-03-07 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> The problem with these things it that sometimes such a task may hold > a lock, which can prevent higher-priority tasks from running. > true ... three ideas: - a sort of temporary priority elevation (the opposite of SCHED_YIELD) as long as the process holds some lock - automatically schedule t

static scheduling - SCHED_IDLE?

2001-03-07 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
hi there, i found, that linux is missing a static low-priority scheduling class (or did i miss something? in this case feel free to stomp me into the ground :). it would be ideal for typical number-crunchers running in the background like the different distributed.net-like clients. within this c

Re: anti-spam regexps

2001-03-05 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> Anybody interested in the ~100 anti-spam regexps I'm using > on NL.linux.org at the moment ? > there is a much simpler method: drop any mail, which does not contain the address of the mailing list in To: or Cc:. Bcc: mails (who wants to post with a bcc legitimately?) and bulk mailers (which do

Re: [PATCH] quick reboot on i386

2001-02-27 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> > remember quarterdeck's quickreboot from "good" (*cough*) old D{o|O}S > > days? here it is for linux! it's only of limited use, especially > > in it's current state, but some people might find it useful. > > Hmm, I'm probably going to apply this one, as I hate behaviour of my > bios: if you po

[PATCH] quick reboot on i386

2001-02-26 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
hi there, remember quarterdeck's quickreboot from "good" (*cough*) old D{o|O}S days? here it is for linux! it's only of limited use, especially in it's current state, but some people might find it useful. the first patch is the kernel patch. note, that it makes qreboot the default, if you specif