Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

On Feb 10, 2008 12:22 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:40:53AM -0500, Niki Denev wrote: > > this fixed the problem for me (kernel 2.6.24.1) : > > It appears that the initial patch checked the input to vmsplice_to_user, >

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

On Feb 10, 2008 12:47 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:39:05PM +0000, Niki Denev wrote: > > This patch is against 2.6.24.1 which has already the fix to vmsplice_to_user > > With it i can't exploit the hole, and it is returns &qu

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

On Feb 10, 2008 12:22 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:40:53AM -0500, Niki Denev wrote: > > this fixed the problem for me (kernel 2.6.24.1) : > > It appears that the initial patch checked the input to vmsplice_to_user, >

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

On Feb 10, 2008 1:38 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008 8:32 AM, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As the subject sa

Re: kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

On Feb 10, 2008 8:32 AM, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As the subject says the 2.6.24.1 is still vulnerable to the vmsplice > > local root exploit. > > Yes indeed

kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

Hi, As the subject says the 2.6.24.1 is still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ uname -a Linux tester 2.6.24.1 #1 Sun Feb 10 00:06:49 EST 2008 i686 unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ ./vms --- Linux vmsplice Local Root Exploit B