Re: [PATCH v2] mm: exclude isolated non-lru pages from NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE.

2016-10-18 Thread Ming Ling
gt; stable because there was no bug report for it AFAIU. > > > --- > > > From 3b2bd4486f36ada9f6dc86d3946855281455ba9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Ming Ling > > > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:26:50 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] mm, compaction: fix NR

Re: [PATCH v2] mm: exclude isolated non-lru pages from NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE.

2016-10-14 Thread Ming Ling
On 四, 10月 13, 2016 at 10:09:37上午 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: Hello, > On Thu 13-10-16 14:39:09, ming.ling wrote: > > From: Ming Ling > > > > Non-lru pages don't belong to any lru, so counting them to > > NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE doesn't make any

Re: [PATCH] mm: exclude isolated non-lru pages from NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE.

2016-09-30 Thread Ming Ling
Hello, On 五, 9月 30, 2016 at 11:37:37上午 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:31:03PM +0800, ming.ling wrote: > > Non-lru pages don't belong to any lru, so accounting them to > > NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE doesn't make any sense. > > It may misguide functions

Re: [PATCH] mm: exclude isolated non-lru pages from NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE.

2016-09-29 Thread Ming Ling
On 四, 9月 29, 2016 at 10:01:43上午 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 28-09-16 17:31:03, ming.ling wrote: > > Non-lru pages don't belong to any lru, so accounting them to > > NR_ISOLATED_ANON or NR_ISOLATED_FILE doesn't make any sense. > > It may misguide functions such as pgdat_reclaimable_pages an