> I hope the following adds a more direct perspective on this, as I
> was a user at the time.
I was _almost_ at university :-). However I do have a first edition
of the IBM Xenix Software Development Guide from december 1984. It has
'84 IBM copyright and '83 MS copyright. The SCO stuff I have goe
Here's something I did last year and then put on ice, partly
through lack of time and partly because I thought I'd pick
it up for 2.5.
All this talk of event queues misses one thing: we already
have an event queue mechanism. They're called wait queues.
The only problem is that the only on-event
> Right you are, both of you. I guess was confusing 'route' with
> 'interface' and didn't think of using multiple routes like that. It
> would be a kludge but whatever gets the job done..
No more than some of the other route attributes like window, rtt,
mtu, ssthresh etc.
> [Mike Jagdis]
> > Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route?
>
> Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best-
> connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most benefit
> from ECN -- and those same routes are
> More with their firewall. But try
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route?
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
> Q: Then why isn't kdb in the kernel?
> A: Uh...
More to the point, why don't the people that want a kernel
debugger maintain kdb and simply drop in the patch when they
need it? If Jeff releases his debugger will anyone care enough
to maintain it? Less talk, more action methinks :-).
> What IS this urge to be handicapped
> when trying to debug the most important pieces of what gets
> delivered on the distribution CDROMs. Is it, "I'm so hairy chested
> that I can code with one metaphorical arm tied behind my
> equally cliched back?"
There are those that like to visualize thing
7 matches
Mail list logo
