ed? I would find these
values quite useful!
TIA, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316 692343
Geisslergasse 4 GSM: +43 676 3079941
A-8045 Graz, Au
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Michael Reinelt wrote:
> >
> > Thats clear to me. But the probe and remove routine can only be called
> > if the module is already loaded. My question was: who will load the
> > module? (I'll call it 'netmos.o')
>
> ty
> I dontt. Other than comparing the 2.2 and 2.4 driver
Surprise, surprise! I just got an email from Patrick Petersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with a 2.4 driver I should test
I'll keep you up to date, and will send you a patch if you like to.
bye, Michael
--
netWorks
are the
2.4 driver to the actual 2.2 one, there are far too much differences for
me...
bye, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316 692343
Geisslergasse 4
ng configurations, and would not require any design changes.
Suggestion: multifunction quirks for 2.4, one of the clean solutions for
2.5?
bye, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316 6923
that netmos.o should be loaded. That looks clean to me,
but I'm not shure if this sort of PCI hotplugging is already
implemented.
bye, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316
are is junk. But there's a lack
of alternatives
If there's a reasonable number of 'good' hardware out there, I'll forget
about Netmos and buy me a new card. If not, I'm willing to provide a
driver.
bye, Michael
--
netWorks
Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 01:33:25PM +0200, Michael Reinelt wrote:
>
> > Adding PCI entries to both serial.c and parport_pc.c was that easy
>
> And that's how it should be, IMHO. There needs to be provision for
> more than one driver to be
Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> Gérard Roudier wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Michael Reinelt wrote:
> >
> > > The card shows up on the PCI bus as one device. For the card provides
> > > both serial and parallel ports, it will be driven by two subsystems
to 2.4. I'd like to talk to this person, and help
merging the 2.2 updates to 2.4.
TIA, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316 692343
Geisslergasse 4
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Michael Reinelt wrote:
> > basically an extension of the pci id tables; and I hope it's in the
> > queue for the official kernel.
>
> Where is this patch available? I haven't heard of an extension to the
> pci id tables, so I wonde
solve. Maybe we need a flag for such devices which allows it to be
claimed ba more thean one driver?
In the meantime, what can I do to get both ports working?
TIA, Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt
it yesterday, you
are right, there is microsecond resolution. Even on an old 2.0.38
kernel...
This solves all my problems. I'll loop on gettimeofday().
Thanks a lot!
Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt
george anzinger wrote:
>
> Michael Reinelt wrote:
> >
> > At the moment I implemented by own delay loop using a small assembler
> > loop similar to the one used in the kernel. This has two disadvantages:
> > assembler isn't that portable, and the loop has t
these small delays is not possible with
SCHED_OTHER?
TIA,
Michael
--
netWorks Vox: +43 316 692396
Michael Reinelt Fax: +43 316 692343
Geisslergasse 4 GSM: +43 676 3079941
A-8045 Graz,
15 matches
Mail list logo