On Monday 23 December 2013 12:01:06 Liam Lindholm wrote:
> Dear fellow Linux kernel hackers:
>
> It has come to my attention that Richard M. Stallman, founder of the
> Free Software Foundation and creator of the GNU project, has once
> again set out to fragment our grassroots community.
>
> Recen
On Friday 28 December 2012 20:53:10 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:05 +0100, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Since the release of 3.7 my main computer has been panicking a couple of
> > times on both 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 because of a
troller: NVIDIA Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]
(rev a1)
03:07.0 Multimedia controller: Twinhan Technology Co. Ltd Mantis DTV PCI Bridge
Controller [Ver 1.0] (rev 01)
Please tell, if more info is needed.
Regards,
Martin Nybo Andersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:59:33 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > I want to use *my* old machines (hey, I payed for them) on whatever new
> > hardware I can plug into them. I'm not an oracle and can't see into the
> > future, however USB
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:18:49 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > That's right, but new hardware, that I wish to use with the old machines
> > might
> > not because of no backporting of new drivers. Same goes for new software
> >
On Friday 24 August 2012 19:05:53 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > What I'd hate even more is rendering my old working hardware useless by
> > removing x86-32 support from the kernel. To reason the removal by saying
> > "Microsoft p
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:24:16 Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 10:14 AM, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > (And I'm still not sure why one would run 32-bit applications on a 64-bit
> > architecture...)
>
> There are several architectures (powerpc comes to mind) w
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:17:14 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > Ahh..., so the development time saved by not supporting x86-32 in
> > mainline can
> > now be used by backporting new features to the forementioned long term
> > tree?
On Friday 24 August 2012 17:55:08 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > You really think that there are no 32bit x86-compatible CPUs in the
> > embedded world?
>
> x86-32 would be supported by long term tree until all x86-32 CPU disappear
Ahh..., so the development time saved
can spend their time supporting X32
> instead of x86-32 or support x86-64 only as 99% of users will be able
> to run x86-64 software if x86-32 will be dropped
> - wouldn't be dropped this year, but there should be plan when it will
> be dropped e.g. when Windows 9 will be released
>
&
10 matches
Mail list logo
