Hi Randy,
thank you very much. I would not mind dropping my name but I tested the patch
now with 5.4.89 so you may actually also add
Tested-by: Martin Mokrejs
It also happened with 5.10.7, it is probably obvious.
Thank you for quick action.
Martin
On 16/01/2021 22:13, Randy Dunlap wrote
ter successful memory
allocation, before reaching any error paths.
References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/191
Reported-by: Martin Mokrejs
Tested-by: Peter Wu [ACPI conflict error path]
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu
---
Hi Jean,
This memleak issue is still present in v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad.
F
While you are probably thinking about the iwlwifi issue causing RT throttling
I have one more interesting followup below.
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>> It means you have (a) real-time task(s) that consume significant amou
Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>>> Nope, you get that message once to tell you that we throttle RT tasks.
>>>
>>> I think the message could improved to explain this is a warn ONCE message
>>> and
>>> that there is no "[sched_delayed] sched: RT throt
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:35:24PM +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>
>> # ps -deo pid,cls,cmd | grep -e 'RR \[' -e 'FF \['
>
> This explicitly only lists kernel threads; from your other comment:
>
>> The shell/python tasks h
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:38:53PM +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>> It means you have (a) real-time task(s) that consume significant amount
>>
>> How can I find them?
>
> ps -deo pid,cls,cmd | grep -e RR -e FF
# ps -deo pid,cls,cmd | gr
Hi Peter,
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:53:02AM +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I tried to figure out what this message really means. I came to
>> https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>> but I am still lost.
Hi,
I tried to figure out what this message really means. I came to
https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions
but I am still lost. I lack in the FAQ some user-related information.
The first paragraph is still unclear to me. I have a i7-2640M based
laptop, hyperthreading is
Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:41:38 +0100,
> Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>
>> Hi Takashi,
>> would you please describe your test system in more detail? How
>> about 'lspci -tv'? And 'lsusb -v' of the broken device?
>
> I left
Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2013-5-29 7:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:44:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL sometimes,
>>> although the chances are small, I think it should be fixed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo
>>
Hi,
while you are chasing some problem with i2c_801 I would like to mention
that I never got an answer on the thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/405
about a kmemleak reported by kernel . Maybe this could give you a hint?
If these do not overlap I would be anyways glad to receive an answer via
Hi,
I opened yet another bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57411 .
This is maybe a dupe of bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57401
(which is vanilla 3.9) but happened on linux-next-20130501 after I did "dmesg |
less".
? pid_param_set
intel_pstate_timer_func
call_tim
Hi,
I just this kernel crash on my laptop running fine so far on 3.7.10 (and 3.8.5
if really necessary). The 3.9 was running for maybe 2 hrs, at the most. :(
? cpumask_weight
call_timer_fn.clone
? init_timer_key
run_timer_softirq
? cpumask_weight
__do_softirq
smp_apic_timer_interrupt
apic_timer_
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, April 01, 2013 11:34:46 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> [+cc Zheng, who added this with 71a83bd727]
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
T
So, I re-tested again with the patch and 3.8.3 but without laptop-mode-tools.
The xHCI port works fine provided
/sys/bus/pci/devices/:0b:00.0/power/control
is set to on and /sys/bus/pci/devices/:00:1c.4/power/control also to on.
If I set parent 1c.4 to auto, it gets suspended and the port
vostro ~ #
My apologies if that twisted the test and thanks for you detailed explanations.
I will spot below, however, a few questions.
Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:05:54PM +0100, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>
>> Nevertheless, I went to check if if the USB3 socke
Hi,
I applied this patches over 3.8.3 hoping it will fix my issue under
thread: "Re: 3.8.2: xhci port is dead until pcieport PME# goes to disabled"
but unfortunately, it is even worse! Now, although lsusb -v nor lsusb -vv do
wakeup the XHCI port but it falls asleep immediately, more quickly than
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> pavel@amd:~$ cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
>> present: yes
>> design capacity: 0 mWh
>> last full capacity: 0 mWh
>> battery technology: rechargeable
>> design voltage: 14400 mV
>>
>> Th
Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi Takashi,
> would you please describe your test system in more detail? How
> about 'lspci -tv'? And 'lsusb -v' of the broken device?
>
> 1. For me on Dell Vostro 3550 with a SandyBridge chip doing all
> SATA+USB2+ExpressCar
Hi Takashi,
would you please describe your test system in more detail? How
about 'lspci -tv'? And 'lsusb -v' of the broken device?
1. For me on Dell Vostro 3550 with a SandyBridge chip doing all
SATA+USB2+ExpressCardSlot:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Fam
Hi Alex,
I was just going to ask you whether your patch would "explain" why pciehp has
in my experience broken presence detection while acpiphp has not (on 3.7 kernel)
and whether the patch will fix it.
Some testing I have done in the past on 3.2 kernel and on 3.7.1, with no
fixes.
Maybe you a
Hi Chris,
Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 01/28/13 21:02, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Chris Clayton wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> On 01/28/13 12:12, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>>> Chris Clayton wrote:
>>&
Hi Chris,
Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 01/28/13 12:12, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> [chris:~]$ cat /proc/cmdline
>>>> root=/dev/sda5 pciehp_ports=native ro resume=/dev/sda6
>
Chris Clayton wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> [chris:~]$ cat /proc/cmdline
>> root=/dev/sda5 pciehp_ports=native ro resume=/dev/sda6
> ^^
> **typo**
> I've run the test again with pcie_ports=native and the directories now get
> populated. Even better though, is that
Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Yijing,
>
> On 01/28/13 02:40, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>> Sorry for the delay reply. It seems like my reply last night was missed.
>>
>> From the sysinfo you provide, there are no pcie port devices under
>> /sys/bus/pci_express/devices.
>> Maybe because th
Hi Chris,
Chris Clayton wrote:
> Thanks again, Martin.
>
> Firstly, maybe we should remove the linux-media list from the copy list. I
> imagine this hotplug stuff is just noise to them.
>
> [snip]
>> Do you have any other express card around to try if it works at all? Try
>> that always after
Chris Clayton wrote:
>
>
> On 01/27/13 14:26, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Chris Clayton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/27/13 12:18, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>> 于 2013-01-27 19:19, Chris Clayton 写道:
>>>>> Hi Yijing
>>>>>
&g
Chris Clayton wrote:
>
>
> On 01/27/13 12:18, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> 于 2013-01-27 19:19, Chris Clayton 写道:
>>> Hi Yijing
>>>
>>> On 01/27/13 02:45, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>>> 于 2013-01-27 4:54, Chris Clayton 写道:
>>>>> Hi Martin,
Hi Chris,
Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 01/24/13 19:21, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>try to include in kernel only acpiphp and omit pciehp. Don't use modules
>> but include
>> them statically. And try, in addition, check whether &
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Hi Sarah and Alan,
>> I just saw 3.7.5 patches announced by Greg but I don't see this path in
>> there.
>> And, don't know but maybe this applies to older stable kernels as
to "stable@"? ;-)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:32:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern
To: Sarah Sharp
cc: Martin Mokrejs ,
USB list
Subject: [PATCH] USB: XHCI: fix memory leak of URB-private data
Message-ID:
Thank you,
Martin
Alan Stern wrote:
> This patch (as1640) fixes a memory
Hi Chris,
try to include in kernel only acpiphp and omit pciehp. Don't use modules but
include
them statically. And try, in addition, check whether "pcie_aspm=off" in
grub.conf helped.
The best would if you subscribe to linux-pci, and read my recent threads
about similar issues I had with ex
Hi,
today I got the following report from the kernel, looks it happened when
I started/used/quit chromium browser. I haven't seen this with 3.7.1 but
I use builtin kmemleak detector only for 2-3 weeks.
unreferenced object 0x880402d08000 (size 2048):
comm "chrome_sandbox", pid 18437, jiffie
Hi Jean,
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:15:37 +0100, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I already reported this to lkml recently with linux-3.7.1 but this is to
>> let you know
>> that with 3.7.4 I am still getting this kmemleak rep
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
> wrote:
>> El 16/01/13 02:11, Yinghai Lu escribió:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
>>> wrote:
[0.00] e820: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[0.00] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>
>> I was running 3.7.1 kernel quite fine for a while but I realized that it is
>> slow and that
>> I should go and drop useless kernel drivers from my kernel. I have a
>> SandyBridge-based
>>
Hi,
I just hit this thread in my bloated Inbox.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 03:03:53 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Well, I don't see what functional problems that can bring.
>>>
>>> In theory people may want to
Hi,
today I received the following.
[ 124.927854] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
[ 124.987250] acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.5
[ 124.992228] pci_bus :11: dev 00, created physical slot 1
[ 124.992448] acpiphp: Slot [1] registered
[ 233.258244]
Hi Hilf,
thank you for your answer on this albeit I am not sure I understood your
point well.
Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello Martin
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Martin Mokrejs
> wrote:
>> time to time. With ondemand governor I had cores in C7 for 50-70% of the
>
;> rcu: endless stalls
>> From: Mike Galbraith
>> linux-3.4-rc7: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>> From: Martin Mokrejs
>> RCU stalls in linux-next
>> From: Dan Carpenter
>>
>> I try to reproduce the issue on my X86 server with 12 cpu
&g
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:20:39PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 18/05/07, Martin Mokrejs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
> > hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I h
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:38:18PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 15:51 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:17:06PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> &
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:17:06PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
> > hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have
Hi,
I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have
cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I
tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel
commandline
> I used to shutdown my P4 machine based on ASUS P4C800E-Deluxe
> with simple "init 0" command. That somehow broke between 2.6.12-rc6-git2
> and 2.6.13-rc1. The machines makes the sound like shutdown but it
> immediately turns the power on again. I used acpi and the kernel
> configs should be alm
Hi,
I used to shutdown my P4 machine based on ASUS P4C800E-Deluxe
with simple "init 0" command. That somehow broke between 2.6.12-rc6-git2
and 2.6.13-rc1. The machines makes the sound like shutdown but it
immediately turns the power on again. I used acpi and the kernel
configs should be almost id
Hi,
I use on i686 architecture Gentoo linux with XFS filesystem.
Recently it happened to me 3 time that the machine locked,
although at least once sys-rq+b worked. Here is the log
from remote console. I don't remeber having such problems
with 2.6.12-rc6-git2, which was my previous testing kernel.
DervishD wrote:
again I've hit some wird problem doing "make dep" for 2.4 kernel:
Not a kernel problem but a findutils problem. Fixed in 4.2.19,
but 4.2.20 was released recently. Upgrade.
You were right. Thanks!
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
48 matches
Mail list logo
