rvalho Chehab
>
> Thanks, patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
>
> Rafael, I assume you will merge this through your tree?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Looks good to me too - though I'd missed the fact the file had moved
somehow :)
Not sure if my r
On 11/02/2021 15:16, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> This series adds a driver to provide platform profile support on 5th-
> and later generation Microsoft Surface devices with a Surface System
> Aggregator Module. On those devices, the platform profile can be used to
> influence cooling behavior and power
Hi Jiaxun,
On 05/01/2021 01:24, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> 在 2021/1/5 上午5:58, Mark Pearson 写道:
>> On 04/01/2021 15:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 1/4/21 9:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:36 PM Hans de Goede
&g
On 04/01/2021 15:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/4/21 9:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:36 PM Hans de Goede
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 1/1/21 1:56 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Tested on Lenovo Yoga-14SARE Chinese Edition.
>
>> Also, on a somewha
Thanks Hans
On 14/12/2020 13:31, Mark Pearson wrote:
>
>
>
> *From:* Hans de Goede
> *Sent:* December 14, 2020 13:24
> *To:* Mario Limonciello ; Jeff Kirsher
> ; Tony Nguyen ;
> intel-wired-...@li
Hi Jon,
On 09/12/2020 09:33, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:56:31 -0500 Mark Pearson
> wrote:
>
>> I do see: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree but I
>> think this is benign - I believe I'm getting it just because I
>> conver
On 09/12/2020 04:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) failed
> like this:
>
> Sphinx parallel build error:
> docutils.utils.SystemMessage:
> /home/sfr/next/next/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile.rst:1:
> (SEVERE/
Thanks Hans and Bastien,
On 28/10/2020 13:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10/28/20 2:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hey Hans, Mark,
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 12:42 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
From: Hans de Goede
On modern systems the platform performance, temperature, fan and
other
hardware
ic API for
selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms.
Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson
Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
Changes in V1:
- Moved from RFC to proposed patch
- Added cool profile as requested
- removed extra-profiles as no longer relevant
On 27/10/2020 09:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 10/27/20 1:28 PM, Mark Pearson wrote:
Hi Elia
On 27/10/2020 05:19, Elia Devito wrote:
Hi to all,
In data martedì 27 ottobre 2020 08:54:44 CET, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
This look good,
only thing is that hp-wmi driver need a cool
Hi Elia
On 27/10/2020 05:19, Elia Devito wrote:
Hi to all,
In data martedì 27 ottobre 2020 08:54:44 CET, Hans de Goede ha scritto:
Hi,
On 10/26/20 8:55 PM, Mark Pearson wrote:
Thanks Hans
On 26/10/2020 14:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thank you for this new version.
On 10/26/20 6:44
Thanks Hans
On 26/10/2020 14:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thank you for this new version.
On 10/26/20 6:44 PM, Mark Pearson wrote:
From: Hans de Goede
+
+If for some reason there is no good match when mapping then a new profile-name
+may be added. Drivers which wish to introduce
ic API for
selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms.
Co-developed-by: Mark Pearson
Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
---
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-platform_profile| 85 +++
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documen
ider.
Rafael, any suggestions / preference for where this should be added under
drivers/acpi ? In a new .c file perhaps ?
3.1 Use the code from 2 to add support for platform-profile selection in
thinkpad_acpi (something for me or Mark Pearson) to do
3.2 Use the code from 2 to add support for p
based address>
On 2020-10-16 10:32 a.m., Mark Pearson wrote:
*From:* Elia Devito
*Sent:* October 16, 2020 10:26
*To:* Rafael J. Wysocki ; Hans de Goede
*Cc:* Daniel Lezcano ; Srinivas Pandruvada
; Lukasz L
On 2020-10-05 12:56 p.m., Limonciello, Mario wrote:
When implemented for the two vendors mentioned here, it would be using a
proprietary "firmware API" implemented by those two vendors. For example
write
arguments (0x1, 0x2) to ACPI-WMI method WMFT and it will cause firmware to
coordinate
On 2020-10-05 12:11 p.m., Limonciello, Mario wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but I don't really see why this interface would be tied
to
ACPI devices? Why is it not possible to write a driver that implements this
interface
and directly modifies device registers? Am I missing something obvious here
performance_profile class/sysfs API which offers a generic
API for selecting the performance-profile of these automatic-mechanisms.
Cc: Mark Pearson
Cc: Elia Devito
Cc: Bastien Nocera
Cc: Benjamin Berg
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede
18 matches
Mail list logo
