On So, 2014-06-22 at 15:15 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/22/2014 02:21 PM, Manuel Schölling wrote:
>
> > The time comparsion functions require arguments of type unsigned long
> > instead of (signed) long.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/in
This version reuses an "old" scrollback buffer of the previous console
if memory allocation fails.
However, the issue of clearing the console using the 'clear_console'
commnad [1,2] is still unsolved. I'd prefer implementing it using a
ioctl() call but it's open for discussion ;)
[1] https://sour
On Sa, 2014-06-07 at 14:42 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Manuel Schölling wrote:
>
> > dns_query() credulously assumes that keys are null-terminated and
> > returns a copy of a memory block that is off by one.
>
> No sign-off? Please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
It'
LOL, that was stupid!
Sorry, I'll send a corrected version in a second...
On Sa, 2014-06-07 at 14:54 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Manuel Schölling
> wrote:
> > dns_query() credulously assumes that keys are null-terminated and
> > returns a copy of a memory block
On Sa, 2014-05-31 at 00:26 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Manuel Schölling , 2014-05-30, 15:27:
> >Add a scrollback buffers for each VGA console. The benefit is that the
> >scrollback history is not flushed when switching between consoles but
> >is persistent.
>
> Some people rely on this scrollba
Hi Geert,
On Fr, 2014-05-30 at 16:28 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Manuel,
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Manuel Schölling
> wrote:
> > Add a scrollback buffers for each VGA console. The benefit is that
> > the scrollback history is not flushed when switching between
consoles
> > but
On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:33 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:24:33PM +0200, Manuel Schoelling wrote:
> > On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> > > > To be future-pr
On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> > modified to use time_before() instead of plain, error-prone math.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schöll
On So, 2014-05-25 at 22:17 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Manuel Schölling
> wrote:
> > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> > modified to use time_before/_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manuel
Sorry, contrary to the subject of this mail, this is a single file
patch.
Patches 2-3 do not exist.
On Mo, 2014-05-19 at 18:47 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> modified
> to use time_is_before_jiffies() instead of plain, err
Thanks for the detailed review of my patches, guys!
I had a look at the assembler code now, too and you are right about
this.
I was misguided by the KernelJanitor's TODO list [1]. If there is
consensus the corresponding paragraph from that list should be removed.
[1] http://kernelnewbies.org/Kern
11 matches
Mail list logo