Re: [PATCH] xilinx: Fix compiler warning

2014-06-22 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On So, 2014-06-22 at 15:15 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/22/2014 02:21 PM, Manuel Schölling wrote: > > > The time comparsion functions require arguments of type unsigned long > > instead of (signed) long. > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling > > [...] > > > diff --git a/in

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] console: Add persistent scrollback buffers for all VGA consoles

2014-06-14 Thread Manuel Schoelling
This version reuses an "old" scrollback buffer of the previous console if memory allocation fails. However, the issue of clearing the console using the 'clear_console' commnad [1,2] is still unsolved. I'd prefer implementing it using a ioctl() call but it's open for discussion ;) [1] https://sour

Re: [PATCH v2] dns_resolver: assure that dns_query() result is null-terminated

2014-06-07 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On Sa, 2014-06-07 at 14:42 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Manuel Schölling wrote: > > > dns_query() credulously assumes that keys are null-terminated and > > returns a copy of a memory block that is off by one. > > No sign-off? Please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches. It'

Re: [PATCH] dns_resolver: assure that dns_query() result is null-terminated

2014-06-07 Thread Manuel Schoelling
LOL, that was stupid! Sorry, I'll send a corrected version in a second... On Sa, 2014-06-07 at 14:54 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Manuel Schölling > wrote: > > dns_query() credulously assumes that keys are null-terminated and > > returns a copy of a memory block

Re: [PATCH] console: Add persistent scrollback buffers for all VGA consoles

2014-05-31 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On Sa, 2014-05-31 at 00:26 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Manuel Schölling , 2014-05-30, 15:27: > >Add a scrollback buffers for each VGA console. The benefit is that the > >scrollback history is not flushed when switching between consoles but > >is persistent. > > Some people rely on this scrollba

Re: [PATCH] console: Add persistent scrollback buffers for all VGA consoles

2014-05-30 Thread Manuel Schoelling
Hi Geert, On Fr, 2014-05-30 at 16:28 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Manuel, > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Manuel Schölling > wrote: > > Add a scrollback buffers for each VGA console. The benefit is that > > the scrollback history is not flushed when switching between consoles > > but

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: use time_before()

2014-05-25 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:33 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 08:24:33PM +0200, Manuel Schoelling wrote: > > On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > > > > To be future-pr

Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: use time_before()

2014-05-25 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On So, 2014-05-25 at 11:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > > modified to use time_before() instead of plain, error-prone math. > > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Schöll

Re: [PATCH] ipath: use time_before()/_after()

2014-05-25 Thread Manuel Schoelling
On So, 2014-05-25 at 22:17 +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Manuel Schölling > wrote: > > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > > modified to use time_before/_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. > > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: vxge: Use time_is_before_jiffies() for time comparison

2014-05-19 Thread Manuel Schoelling
Sorry, contrary to the subject of this mail, this is a single file patch. Patches 2-3 do not exist. On Mo, 2014-05-19 at 18:47 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote: > To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are > modified > to use time_is_before_jiffies() instead of plain, err

Re: [PATCH] fs: Cleanup string initializations (char[] instead of char *)

2014-05-18 Thread Manuel Schoelling
Thanks for the detailed review of my patches, guys! I had a look at the assembler code now, too and you are right about this. I was misguided by the KernelJanitor's TODO list [1]. If there is consensus the corresponding paragraph from that list should be removed. [1] http://kernelnewbies.org/Kern