Hi Andrea,
1. This mechanism is quite general. It is possible that, although
hibernation may be an important use, there will be other uses for it.
I suggest leaving the hibernation example and performance analysis,
but not mentioning PM or hibernation in the patch subject.
2. It may be useful to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:16 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:53 AM Luigi Semenzato wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:26 PM Luigi Semenzato
> >
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:26 PM Luigi Semenzato wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the quick reply!
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 22
Thank you for the quick reply!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:57 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:09 PM Luigi Semenzato wrote:
> >
> > Following a thread in linux-pm
> > (https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=157012300901871) I have some issues
> &g
Following a thread in linux-pm
(https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=157012300901871) I have some issues
that may be of general interest.
1. To the best of my knowledge, Linux hibernation is guaranteed to
fail if more than 1/2 of total RAM is in use (for instance, by
anonymous pages). My knowledge is
My apologies but the patch
mm-smaps-split-pss-into-components.patch
has a bug (does not update private_clean and private_dirty). Please
do not include it. I will resubmit a corrected version.
Thanks.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 8:53 PM wrote:
>
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2019-05-29-20-52
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:40:44AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Dmitry,
>>
>> Thanks for cleaning up cros_eckeyb. :) I'm a little curious about
>> the motivation here. I can't imagine a keyboard with all that many
>> colum
Thank you, this is useful information, and it would be even more
useful if it made it in Documentation/CodingStyle :-)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 08:12:09AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Dmitry,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dmit
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 20-11-13 00:02:20, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>
>> > > We have basically ended up with 3 options AFAIR:
>> > > 1) allow memcg approach (memcg.oom_control) on the root level
>> > >for
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
-> Android 4.4 KitKat is also using zram, to better support devices with
-> less than 1 MB RAM. (That's the news.)
Sorry, I meant 1 GB RAM.
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/1991-09-27/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
If I may add my usual 2c (and some news):
zram is used by default on all Chrome OS devices. I can't say how
many devices, but it's not a small number, google it, and it's an
important market, low-end laptops for education and the less affluent.
It has been available experimentally for well over
would be removed at the end of each
scan.
I think this would work, i.e. it would have all the right properties,
but I don't have a sense of whether the performance impact is
acceptable. Probably not, or it would have been proposed earlier.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Luigi Semenzato
h.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Sameer Nanda wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:27 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
>>
>> > It's not enough to hold a reference to the task struct, because it can
>>
It's not enough to hold a reference to the task struct, because it can
still be taken out of the circular list of threads. The RCU
assumptions don't hold in that case.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:18 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Sameer Nanda wrote:
>
>> The selection of the proces
34 PM, Olav Haugan wrote:
> Hi Luigi,
>
> On 10/24/2013 6:12 PM, Luigi Semenzato wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Olav Haugan wrote:
>>> Hi Bob, Luigi,
>>>
>>> On 10/23/2013 5:55 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/24/2013
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Olav Haugan wrote:
> Hi Bob, Luigi,
>
> On 10/23/2013 5:55 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On 10/24/2013 05:51 AM, Olav Haugan wrote:
>>> I am trying to use zram in very low memory conditions and I am having
>>> some issues. zram is in the reclaim path. So if the system i
(sorry about the HTML in the previous message)
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Olav Haugan wrote:
> I am trying to use zram in very low memory conditions and I am having
> some issues. zram is in the reclaim path. So if the system is very low
> on memory the system is trying to reclaim pages by
I know how to reach Rajiv. Let me ping him. (I am not copying him
here for privacy.)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ashley D Lai wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 21:33 +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2013 um 19:55 Uhr
>> > Von: "Joel Schopp"
>>
>>
I completely support Peter's request, and many thanks to Peter for volunteering.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Since I'm actively maintaining the tpm subsystem for a few months now,
> it's time to step up and be an official maintainer for the tpm subsystem,
> atleast unti
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Bob,
>
> Sorry for the late response. I was on holiday.
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:57:41AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>> Hi Minchan,
>>
>> On 08/19/2013 11:18 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > Hello Mel,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:33:4
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 02:55:31PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> It's 6th trial of zram/zsmalloc promotion.
>> [patch 5, zram: promote zram from staging] explains why we need zram.
>>
>> Main reason to block promotion is there was no review of z
During earlier discussions of zswap there was a plan to make it work
with zsmalloc as an option instead of zbud. Does zbud work for
compression factors better than 2:1? I have the impression (maybe
wrong) that it does not. In our use of zram (Chrome OS) typical
overall compression ratios are betw
Error 62 is ETIME. The driver is timing out during a tpm_send,
possibly trying to send the Tpm_SaveState command.
It may be that you cannot talk to the TPM at all. Have you tried
sending messages to the TPM before suspending?
Are there any other tpm entries in the syslog? Like at boot?
What m
[I may have screwed up my previous message, sorry if this is a
duplicate. (Content-Policy reject msg: The message contains HTML
subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus.)]
--
For what it's worth, I tested this patch on my 3.4 kernel, and it
Just a couple of questions and comments as a user. I apologize if
this is the wrong time to make them, feel free to ignore them.
1. It's becoming difficult to understand how zcache, zcache2, zram,
and now zswap, interact and/or overlap with each other. For instance,
I am examining the possibilit
Since Chrome OS was mentioned: the main reason why we don't use swap
to a disk (rotating or SSD) is because it doesn't degrade gracefully
and leads to a bad interactive experience. Generally we prefer to
manage RAM at a higher level, by transparently killing and restarting
processes. But we notic
Commit-ID: 9fdbf671ba7e8adb2cbb93d716232ebcab55f6bd
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9fdbf671ba7e8adb2cbb93d716232ebcab55f6bd
Author: Luigi Semenzato
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:52:20 -0700
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:55:53 -0200
perf tools
There is also this (incomplete, untested) patch, which shows what it
takes to add the new record type.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/345
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:56:13AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> On 8/22/12 10:29 AM, Ar
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Luigi Semenzato wrote:
>
>> This fixes a long-standing bug caused by the lack of separate
>> COMM and EXEC record types, which makes "perf report" lose
>> track of symbols when a process renames itse
nes) and is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato
---
tools/perf/util/thread.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
index fb4b7ea..8b3e593 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/threa
30 matches
Mail list logo
