On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:41:07AM -0700, Nathan Becker took 37 lines to write:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running kernel 2.6.12.5 with x86_64 target on an AMD X2 4800+ and
> Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI motherboard (bios version F8). I'm having a problem
> with lost clock ticks. The dmesg says
>
> warning: many
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:49:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk took 42 lines to write:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:33:00PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > You may as well change the S: to unmaintained whilst
> > you're there, it hasn't seen any updates in a long time,
> > and still uses several out-of-da
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:26:07AM +0200, Adrian Bunk took 109 lines to write:
> This patch removes support for gcc < 3.2 .
>
> The advantages are:
> - reducing the number of supported gcc versions from 8 to 4 [1]
> allows the removal of several #ifdef's and workarounds
> - my impression is that
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 07:48:32AM +0200, Olivier Fourdan took 44 lines to
write:
>
> Kurt
>
> Did you try with the "no_timer_check" boot option?
Just did and it appears to work. Thanks Olivier!
Alas that this chipset seems to have, um, issues.
Kurt
--
Baker's First Law of Federal Geometry:
Hola,
I have an eMachines T6212 Opteron system on which the system clock
seems to run at ~twice the speed of the wall clock. The main board
is an ASUS K8 of some description with at ATI SB400 southbridge and
an ATI RS480 northbridge. Kernel version is 2.6.12.3.
If I disable ACPI, the clock slows
ches.
The patch is against 2.6.12.3. A possibly too quick glance at
MAINTAINERS didn't show one for README.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12.3/README 2005-07-26 21:18:18.0 -0400
+++ b/README2005-07-26 21:25:13.0 -0400
@@ -87,6 +87,16
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Brian Gerst took 21 lines to write:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> >Greetings;
> >
> >I just built what I thought was 2.6.12.3, but my script got a tummy
> >ache because I didn't check the Makefile's EXTRA_VERSION, which was
> >set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my
ch fixes a silly typo conflating RPM-based systems with Debian
derivatives and adds the name of the Debian package to install.
MAINTAINERS doesn't list a maintainer for menuconfig or lxdialog,
so I sent this to lkml, kbuild-devel, and to the kconfig maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Wall &l
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 05:16:32PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 09:57:00AM -0400, Kurt Wall wrote:
> > If you try to run `make menuconfig' on a system that lacks ncurses
> > development libs, you get an error message telling you to install
> > n
AINTAINERS doesn't list a maintainer for menuconfig or lxdialog,
so I sent this to lkml, kbuild-devel, and to the kconfig maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/scripts/lxdialog/Makefile 2005-07-04 09:31:38.0 -0400
+++ b/scripts/lxdialog/Makefile 2005-07-04 09:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:30:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
%
% Hello,
%
% I've found an unfortunate bug in the "linux/timex.h" file. This file
% include "sys/time.h" and this cause any program that use the adjtimex
% syscall to be unable to compile (You get a lot of multiple defini
11 matches
Mail list logo
