Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]

2000-11-28 Thread Kiril Vidimce
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I've never seen such thing as code without bugs. In my experience, > > the NVIDIA drivers are by far the most complete and solid 3D drivers > > under Linux. > > You are welcome to your opinion. I've got this great bridge to sell you too BTW, in case this

Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]

2000-11-28 Thread Kiril Vidimce
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > I've never seen such thing as code without bugs. In my experience, > > the NVIDIA drivers are by far the most complete and solid 3D drivers > > under Linux. > > You are welcome to your opinion. I've got this great bridge to sell you too I don't see the n

Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]

2000-11-28 Thread Kiril Vidimce
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: > > > Dont forget the nvidia driver is completely SMP broken. As in, trash your > > > filesystems broken. > > > > Not true. It works for us with no problems on a number of SMP boxes > > running 2.2.{14,16}. I don't k

Re: XFree 4.0.1/NVIDIA 0.9-5/2.4.0-testX/11 woes [solved]

2000-11-28 Thread Kiril Vidimce
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: > Dont forget the nvidia driver is completely SMP broken. As in, trash your > filesystems broken. Not true. It works for us with no problems on a number of SMP boxes running 2.2.{14,16}. I don't know about 2.4.x. KV -- ___

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-12 Thread Kiril Vidimce
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Kiril Vidimce wrote: > > > My primary concern is whether a process can allocate more than 4 GB of > > memory, rather than just be able to use more than 4 GB of physical > > memory in the system. > &

large memory support for x86

2000-10-11 Thread Kiril Vidimce
Hi there, I am trying to find out more information on large memory support (> 4 GB) for Linux IA32. Is there a document that elaborates on what is supported and what isn't and how this scheme actually works in the kernel? My primary concern is whether a process can allocate more than 4 GB of