Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

2007-06-18 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 6/18/07, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 18, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just want software back. I think it is *wrong* for me to ask for > anything else. It's literally my personal "moral choice": I think the > hardware manufacturers need to make

Re: Instead of GPL License - Why not LKL? (Linux Kernel License)

2007-06-14 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate > and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is > nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe > that GPL3

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-11 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 6/11/07, Kevin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:13 AM, DervishD wrote: > Hi all :) > > I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB > pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any > device whose storage is flash based. Let's

Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc2-v1

2007-05-20 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 5/20/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm pleased to announce an updated version of the x86_64 highres/dyntick support patches against 2.6.22-rc2: http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc2-x86_64-highres-v1.patch Broken out version is available here: http

Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

2007-05-16 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 5/16/07, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:53 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > > My experience is that no matter which name I pick, people will > complain > anyway. Previous suggestions included: > jffs3 > jefs > engelfs > poofs > crapfs > sweetfs > cutefs > dynami

Re: [patch 0/4] IBMASM - miscellaneous fixes

2007-05-15 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 5/15/07, Max Asbock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:12 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi, > > Here is bunch of fixes for ibmasm driver. They are untested as > I do not have the hardware. > > -- > Dmitry Thanks for the fixes. I will test. Max What userland tools are ne

Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8

2007-05-11 Thread Kevin Bowling
On 5/11/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:18:25PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Also notice that current cpus were not designed to work 300 years. > > > When we have hw designed for 50 years+, we can start to worry. On a related note, older techno