Re: Kernel BUG when using corrupted ext3 fs

2007-06-11 Thread Karl Pickett
ly, no. I did not think of logging the fsck output :( I recall hitting 'y' to fix about 30 things, with the last fixes being something like superblocks not matching each other which I hadn't seen before. This machine had also been hard powered off at least 5 times before in the la

Kernel BUG when using corrupted ext3 fs

2007-06-08 Thread Karl Pickett
I had to hard shutdown a fc6 machine due to vmware and nvidia doing ridiculous things to my screen resolution and locking up. ugh. Anyway, upon reboot it recovers the journal and mounts / rw fine. Then rc.sysinit tries to delete various things from /tmp (.ICE-unix, .font stuff, etc), kernel shows

[PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable (V2)

2007-04-05 Thread Karl Pickett
default it to 500ms. The old behavior can be had by setting repeat_delay = 0. Signed-off-by: Karl Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Vincent Vanackere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c.orig 2007-04-04 22:05:10.0 +0200 +++ drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Karl Pickett
that. The spaces were probably my fault, I sent it from a machine with expandtab on (don't ask :) -- Karl Pickett The most wasted of all days is one without laughter.—E.E. Cummings - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a m

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Karl Pickett
Would this be more acceptable? I haven't compiled or tested yet..but you can see what I'm trying to do.. make the delay time based instead of implementation/count based... Signed-off-by: Karl Pickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- ./ati_remote.c.kjp 2007-04-04 10:56:20

Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-04 Thread Karl Pickett
anything but barely tap the button you can get multiple events reported"). Just a thought : perhaps some models are more sensitive than others (and so the default should be made dependent on the exact remote model)... what is your hardware id ? Best regards, Vincent -- Karl Pickett The

[PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable

2007-04-03 Thread Karl Pickett
;& - ati_remote->repeat_count < 5) + ati_remote->repeat_count < repeat_filter_max) return; -- Karl Pickett The most wasted of all days is one without laughter.—E.E. Cummings - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs