Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-26 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
POSIX-compliant. -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH] Remove bashisms from scripts/extract-ikconfig

2007-06-09 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
On 09/06/2007, at 21:34, Christian Kujau wrote: On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote: Wouldn't this be better expressed as: start=$(($start + 8)) size=$(($end - $start)) to avoid invoking a subshell? This is certainly possible for lots for scripts, but was not the &

Re: [PATCH] Remove bashisms from scripts/extract-ikconfig

2007-06-09 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
ull` -let start="$start + 8" -let size="$end - $start" +start="`expr $start + 8`" +size="`expr $end - $start`" Wouldn't this be better expressed as: start=$(($start + 8)) size=$(($end - $start)) to avoid invoking a subshell? --

Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker

2007-05-29 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
f habit, and I bet I'm not alone. Hence, 80 is "annoying" not only because patches will wrap, but also because in some editors the 80th character will also wrap. Just my 2 cents, -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &

Re: 2.6.21.1 - 97% wait time on IDE operations

2007-05-26 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
w if Linux is also involved or not.) -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

Re: Per-CPU data as a structure

2007-05-04 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
stick to per-cpu wherever possible for now. Anyway, what do you think about adding the above text to the code (percpu.h maybe) as documentation? See the patch below. (Dunno if the Signed-off-by line is appropriate as most of the text is yours.) Signed-off-by: Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTE

[PATCH] powerpc: Remove obsolete prototype

2007-05-04 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
regards, Signed-off-by: Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h b/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h index cf95274..00a70e5 100644 --- a/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h @@ -107,7 +107,5 @@ struct paca_struct { extern

Per-CPU data as a structure

2007-05-03 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
But on the other hand, percpu seems like an unnatural approach to "reimplement" regular structures. Thank you very much. -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EM