Randy Dunlap.
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/include/linux/jiffies.h Thu Feb 14 18:04:14 PST 2008
+++ b/include/linux/jiffies.h Thu Feb 14 18:07:17 PST 2008
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
/* LATCH is used in the in
Randy Dunlap.
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/include/linux/jiffies.h Thu Feb 14 18:04:14 PST 2008
+++ b/include/linux/jiffies.h Thu Feb 14 18:07:17 PST 2008
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
/* LATCH is used in the in
On Tue Feb 19 13:25:25 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > +u64 inline jiffies_64_to_usecs(const u64 j)
> > +{
> > + u64 tmp = j*HZ_TO_USEC_NUM + HZ_TO_USEC_DEN-1;
> > + do_div(tmp, HZ_TO_USEC_DEN);
>
> do_div() is:
> * The semantics of do_div() are:
> *
> * uint32_t do_div(uint64_t *n, u
It's possible that the values used in and returned from jiffies_to_usecs() are
incorrect because of truncation when variables of type u64 are involved. So a
function specific to that type is used instead.
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Signed-off-by: Jo
It's possible that the values used in and returned from jiffies_to_usecs() are
incorrect because of truncation when variables of type u64 are involved. So a
function specific to that type is used instead.
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Signed-off-by: Jo
nst: linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/include/linux/jiffies.h 2008-01-07 16:09:17.737040981 -0800
+++ b/include/linux/jiffies.h 2008-01-07 16:09:17.693033003 -0800
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
/* LATCH is used in the interval timer
On Wed Jan 2 16:36:47 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:26:07 -0800 (PST) Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's possible that the values used in and returned from jiffies_to_usec
It's possible that the values used in and returned from jiffies_to_usecs() are
incorrect because of truncation when variables of type u64 are involved. So a
function specific to that type is used instead.
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.23.y.git
Signed-off-by: Jo
On Fri Aug 31 00:24:47 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jonathan Lim wrote:
> > On Sat Aug 25 21:58:44 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Also, I don't understand why the code to update btime:
> >>>
> >>&g
On Sat Aug 25 21:58:44 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Also, I don't understand why the code to update btime:
> >
> > /* calculate task elapsed time in timespec */
> > do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
> > ts = timespec_sub(uptime, tsk->start_time);
> > .
stats_exit() has been called. So we need to move the assignment
before taskstats_exit().
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/kernel/exit.c 2007-08-20 16:37:55.0 -0700
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
On Tue Aug 21 11:27:07 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi Balbir,
> >
> > That was what I wanted to do at first, but there was some concern over
> > whether it would affect any of the intervening function calls. If there's
> > no particular reason why the tsk->exit_code assignment is placed
On Mon Aug 20 20:44:13 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jonathan Lim wrote:
> > taskstats.ac_exitcode is assigned to task_struct.exit_code in
> > bacct_add_tsk() through the following kernel function calls:
> >
> > do_exit()
> > task
only after taskstats_exit_send() has been called. So we need to send 'code'
through to bacct_add_tsk().
Diff'd against: linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/kernel/exit.c 2007-08-20 16:37:55.0 -0700
+++ b/ker
Looking at the diffs below, I see context switch counters added. What is
actually being removed?
Jonathan
On Mon Jun 4 12:33:15 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Add Jonathan Lim to cc, who is working on CSA userland implementation
> to use the taskstats data that this patch is
15 matches
Mail list logo
