Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/2] tcp: Add Redundant Data Bundling (RDB)

2015-10-27 Thread Jonas Markussen
On 26 Oct 2015, at 22:58, Yuchung Cheng wrote: > but would RDB be voided if this developer turns on RDB then turns on > Nagle later? The short answer is answer is "kind of" My understanding is that Nagle will delay segments until they're either MSS-sized or until segments "down the pipe" are ack

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] tcp: Redundant Data Bundling (RDB)

2015-10-24 Thread Jonas Markussen
> On 24 Oct 2015, at 08:11, Yuchung Cheng wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Bendik Rønning Opstad > wrote: >> >> This is a request for comments. >> >> Redundant Data Bundling (RDB) is a mechanism for TCP aimed at reducing >> the latency for applications sending time-dependent data.