Kernel Failure - 3.4.24 Similar USB MO To 3.4.89 Kernel Failure

2014-05-16 Thread John L. Males
onfig file item options I set that are added to the next 3.4.x kernel version I compile. This means there is no reason for my kernel to ever be tainted. If my Linux 3.4.x Kernel is listed as tainted, it is the stock Linux Kernel that has so decided for some reason. Regards, John L. Males Toronto, On

Linux Kernel Commit 025cee7f8fef02af09b03c8e1cd9843cb32adf9b

2013-02-28 Thread John L. Males
ey element of? I am one of those who seems to often cause system kernels of any OS stress due to my very high power user use of Operating Systems and hence why my question. Regards, John L. Males Toronto, Ontario Canada 28 February 2013 17:11 <mailto:jlma...@gmail.com> =

Re[04]: Kernel Failure - 3.4.24

2013-01-30 Thread John L. Males
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian, Message replied to: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:32:53 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: jlma...@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Failure - 3.4.24 > On 01/28/2013 08:57 PM, John L. Males wrote: &g

Re[02]: Kernel Failure - 3.4.24

2013-01-28 Thread John L. Males
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian, Message replied to: Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:14:14 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: jlma...@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Failure - 3.4.24 > On 01/17/2013 12:42 AM, John L. Males wr

Kernel Failure - 3.4.24

2013-01-16 Thread John L. Males
7e4761e5ee97ad0c ]--- If you need additional information please advise. Regards, John L. Males Toronto, Ontario Canada 16 January 2013 18:42 == 2013-01-16 18:19:55.448036096-0500-EST 16 Jan 18:19:55 ntpdate[17025]: ntpdate 4.2.6p2

Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29

2005-03-02 Thread John L. Males
files names in tar to directory? That to me means a big difference in confidance the tar backup is ok, as I look to have readback verify to increase confidance of backup success. > > Yes, I think we need to grit our teeth and do this. I'll stick a > comment in there. Regards, John

Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29

2005-03-02 Thread John L. Males
one > > anything (this was on purpose because it is the way some other > > Unices behave and with reason). In that case this tar succeeded > > but it was pure luck. The first BSF did position the tape > > correctly although it did fail. > > > > The 2.6 st driver do

Re: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29

2005-03-02 Thread John L. Males
Sorry gents, Let me correct this one more time. Regards, John L. Males Willowdale, Ontario Canada 02 March 2005 16:26 ** Reply Seperator ** On (Wed) 2005-03-02 16:15:07 -0500 John L. Males wrote in Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: John L. Males

Re: Re[03]: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29

2005-03-02 Thread John L. Males
. Regards, John L. Males Willowdale, Ontario Canada 02 March 2005 (16:06 -) 16:15 ** Reply Seperator ** On (Wed) 2005-03-02 15:46:26 -0500 John L. Males wrote in Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: John L. Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Su

Re[03]: Problems with SCSI tape rewind / verify on 2.4.29

2005-03-02 Thread John L. Males
gt; > > write: st_write, > > > ioctl: st_ioctl, > > >- llseek: no_llseek, > > > open: st_open, > > > flush: st_flush, > > > release: st_release, > > >- > > > > Interesting Marcelo. How long has this been true in 2.6?

Linux Kernel 2.2.19 Available Memory Bug

2001-07-20 Thread John L. Males
k", and "mem=268435546" (256 X 1024 x 1024). "mem=128m" *** "free -m" indicates "Total Memory" as 124 "free -k" indicates "Total Memory" as 127344 "free -k" indicates "Total Memory" as 130400256 Regards