2.4.5pre.
Are you saying the code should be doing the equivalent of
"(count > LATCH)", or is 2.2.19 correct and the whines I'm
seeing mean there really is a problem with the Serverworks
chipset?
Thanks,
jcastle
Alan Cox wrote:
>Jim Castleberry)wrote:
>> How well has the
I'm getting messages saying "clock timer configuration lost - probably
a VIA686a" from 2.2.19 running on a board using the Serverworks HE
chipset. Reading the list archives it sounds like this problem has
previously been attributed to a possible bug in the VIA chipset.
According to RedHat's bugz
2 matches
Mail list logo