cells, i);
>
> __skb_queue_head_init(&cell->napi_skbs);
> +
> + set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL, &cell->napi.state);
> +
> netif_napi_add(dev, &cell->napi, gro_cell_poll, 64);
> napi_enable(&cell->napi);
> }
>
>
>
>
>
This fixes the problem for me, so for whatever it’s worth:
Tested-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 14:46 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 16:12 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>> synchronize_rcu_expidited is not enough if you have multiple network
>>> devices in play.
>>>
>>> Looking at the c
The setting of the UDP tunnel GSO type is already performed by
udp[46]_gro_complete().
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
drivers/net/geneve.c | 2 --
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 --
include/net/udp_tunnel.h | 9 -
net/ipv4/fou.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 15 deletions
nt or as packet loss.
This patch fixes this by setting skb's 'encapsulation' in
udp_gro_complete() before calling into the inner complete functions,
and by making each possible UDP tunnel gro_complete() callback set the
inner_mac_header to the beginning of the tunnel payload.
Sig
e here.
Furthermore, it was wrongly set to the beginning of the UDP tunnel
header rather than the inner MAC header.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
The setting of the UDP tunnel GSO type is already performed by
udp[46]_gro_complete().
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
drivers/net/geneve.c | 2 --
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 2 --
include/net/udp_tunnel.h | 9 -
net/ipv4/fou.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 15 deletions
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> The original condition is never true. We want to test if BIT(0) is set
> but the code is ANDing with zero.
>
> Fixes: 05752523e565 ('openvswitch: Interface with NAT.')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
>
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conn
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 6:01 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On 10/05/2015 06:59 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/02/2015 12:18 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
When openvswitch tries allocate memory from offline numa node
Thanks for spotting and fixing this,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> Set actions consist of a regular OVS_KEY_ATTR_* attribute nested inside
> of a OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET action attribute. When converting masked actions
> back
9 matches
Mail list logo
