On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:14:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > There are uses for both. For example today I was updating the tar ball
> > > which is used to create the var file system for a new chroot. I
> > > certainly
> > > want to see corretly setup owner/permissions when I look into t
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 21:08:25 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > There was a thread a few months ago where file-as-directory was
> > discussed extensively, after Namesys implemented it. That's where the
> > conversation on detachable mount points originated AFAIR. It will
> > probably happen at
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 17:13:03 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > Note that NFS checks the permissions on _both_ the client and server,
> > > for a reason.
> >
> > Does it? If I read the code correctly the client checks credentials
> > supplied by the server (or cached).
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 17:56:09 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Could you explain a little more? I don't see the point in denying
> > access to root, but I also can't tell from your explanation whether you
> > do or not.
>
> Fuse by default does. This can be disabled by one of two mount
> opti
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:56:06 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
> On 2005-04-11, at 04:26, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> >Marcin Dalecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>Better don't waste your time with looking at Arch. Stick with patches
> >>you maintain by hand combined with some scripts containing a
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 03:01:29 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
> On 2005-04-07, at 09:44, Jan Hudec wrote:
> >
> >I have looked at most systems currently available. I would suggest
> >following for closer look on:
> >
> >1) GNU Arch/Bazaar. They use the s
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:42:08 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading
> up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't
> pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are
> already
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:26:30 +0100, Weber Matthias wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 20:05:42 +0100, Weber Matthias wrote:
> >> is there any chance to signal an EOF when writing data to kernel via proc
> >> fs? >> Actually if the length of data is N*PAGE_SIZE it seems not to be
> >> detectable
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 20:05:42 +0100, Weber Matthias wrote:
> is there any chance to signal an EOF when writing data to kernel via proc fs?
> Actually if the length of data is N*PAGE_SIZE it seems not to be detectable.
> I followed up the "struct file" but haven't found anything that helped...
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 20:23:55 -0800, Om wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 01:40:51PM -0800, Rock Gordon wrote:
> > Hi everbody,
> >
> > Thanks for your replies.
> >
> > However I think my copy_to_user and copy_from_user are
> > failing since the kernel-mode thread is copying data
> > into anoth
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:35:13AM -0600, Blesson Paul wrote:
> 1: P1 and P2 have different physical areas of memory. This is how
> protection works.
>
> 2: Why do they need to share the same memory? You can have your second
> process
> communicate with your first process through IPC.
>
> 3: Li
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:26:29AM -0700, Christopher Smith wrote:
> At 10:59 AM 6/28/2001 -0400, Dan Maas wrote:
> >life-threatening things like SIGTERM, SIGKILL, and SIGSEGV. The mutation
> >into queued, information-carrying siginfo signals just shows how badly we
> >need a more robust event mod
Hello,
> I am happy that processes in Linux are so marvelous. Linux does not need
> a decent POSIX threads implementation because the same functionality can
> be achived with processes. Do what you like, you write the kernel code.
> I could write my soft using fork special fetaures in Linux.
> Bu
er TCP?
For puropose of shool excercise the work saved with RPC might be tha main argument.
- Jan Hudec `Bulb' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from t
ets got the 8-bit dma channels handling wrong, but I really
don't know. Btw: for me 2.2.x autodetected right, 2.4.x need explicit setting.
- Jan Hudec `Bulb' &
s the
connection was correctly shutdown and closed.
Btw: can the aplication somehow ask the tcp/ip stack what was actualy acked?
(ie. how many bytes were acked).
--------
- J
Hi,
When I compiled and booted 2.4.5, the machine got stuck in
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
(SysRq still worked, ^C did not seem to).
I tried to strace it. Last thing strace managed to write was:
ioctl(4, 0x8914
(no comma, not including the trird argument). I tried to switch of some
compile-time par
that's 1) Wrong 2) I need 4 bits ... that's 16 choices.
It's wrong because append is specified in addition to write (for open syscall).
--------
- Jan Hudec `Bulb&
be queried and permission is
definitely no good place. Lookup might do, but it might not do on other
operating systems.
--------
- Jan Hudec `Bulb' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
can read the
> file via /proc//mem or attach debugger to the process...
It does not make sence (x without r). But it surely makes sence to have a
program with read but without exec permission (though it can be made to
run).
before 2.5,
right?
Thanks in advance.
Bulb
- Jan Hudec `Bulb' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
> Blesson Paul writes:
>
> > This is an another doubt related to VFS. I want to know
> > wheather all files are assigned their inode number at the
> > mounting time itself or inodes are assigned to files upon
> > accessing only
>
> That would depend on what type of filesystem you use.
> For ext2
22 matches
Mail list logo
