Re: serial port O_SYNC func.. by "Stuart MacDonald"@conne
> From: "James R Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > As far as I can tell from observed operation and from perusing the
> > code, O_SYNC doesn't seem to be supported by the serial driver
As far as I can tell from observed operation and from perusing the
code, O_SYNC doesn't seem to be supported by the serial driver in
2.4.5. Writes are forced as far as the serial.c's circular queue, but
O_SYNC seems to be ignored from there on, so any application trying to
do small synchronous w
Hi again. The latter half of my email seems to have been forgotten in
the ensuing discussion, so I'll repost. For a linked list of any
non-floating point data, radix sort is almost impossible to beat; it's
iterative, fast (linear time for fixed size integers, worst case), can
be stopped early f
Quicksort works just fine on a linked list, as long as you broaden
your view beyond the common array-based implementations. See
"http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jbruce/sort.cc" for an example, although I
would recommend using a radix sort for linked lists in most situations
(sorry for the C++, but it was
4 matches
Mail list logo
