nually type stuff in on my other machine (in this email). :(
--
James A. Pattie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux -- SysAdmin / Programmer
PC & Web Xperience, Inc.
http://www.pcxperience.com/
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
#
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_ISA=y
# CONFIG_SBUS i
Colonel wrote:
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:45:02 -0600
> From: "James A. Pattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Colonel wrote:
>
>>>There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when me
ected the system. when the system
was untarring my tarball, the memory usage would get down < 500kb and swap would be
around a couple of megs usually.
>
>
> PS for james:
> >One thing I did notice was that the syncing of the raid 1 arrays went in
> sequence, md0, md1, md2 instead
o occur when
> buffer/cache memory is low (<6MB), you could have tons of swap and still
> reach this level.
>
> Later,
> Tom
You were right! I managed to find another 32MB of memory to bump it up to 64
MB total and it worked perfectly. It appears that I had only about 4 MB of
buf
I'm
tempted to take the 2 drives out and put them in the k6-2, but that's too much
of a hassle. I'm currently going to try 2.4.1-ac19 and see what happens.
The machine does have 128MB of swap space working, and whenever I've checked
memory usage (while the system was still respond
t.
I just tried with 2.4.1-ac14, raid and raid1 compiled in and it did the
same thing. I'm going to try to compile reiserfs in (if I have enough room
to still fit the kernel on the floppy with it's initial ramdisk, etc.) and
see what that does.
--
James A. Pattie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Li
28 MB
system. No raid, just one reiserfs partition and it untarred without
any issues. I'm thinking this is something specific to older, lower
memory machines?
--
James A. Pattie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux -- SysAdmin / Programmer
PC & Web Xperience, Inc.
http://www.pcxperience.com/
-
7 matches
Mail list logo
