Ronald Bultje wrote:
> I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in
> my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me
> that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with more than 128
> MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability pro
Ted Gervais wrote:
> I just ran into something odd. To me anyways, it was odd.
> I just installed and brought up kernel 2.4.5 and my ipchains failed.
> So I upgraded to the latest (that I could find) ipchains-1.3.10, and
> that also fails.
>
> Has anyone got any version of ipchains to work with t
Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> Ah... the joy of reading mail using non-MS software, on a non-MS OS...
>
> Hahaha, indeed!
Indeed, since:
Jun 15 15:39:03 mirai sendmail[21499]: f5FMd2t21499:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=33547, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bodytype=7BIT, proto=ESM
Blesson Paul wrote:
> hi
> I just brought a CD of RedHat 7. Unfortunately I
> couldn't find the inetd rpm. wheather it is missing or it is in any other
> name
It's xinetd -
BTW You might think about RH 7.1 since 7.0
was the end of the line for the legacy 2.2. kernel -
cu
Hi Roy,
IIRC Ingo posted some tux benchmark results on
the khttpd mailing list some weeks ago - basically
khttpd is not in the same ballpark at this point.
cu
jjs
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I tried to send this message to the khttpd group, but got no answer. Can
> any of y
Peter Rival wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> > J Sloan writes:
> > > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
> > > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup
> > > with a special web cache in
Ronald Bultje wrote:
> On 18 May 2001 10:12:34 +0200, reiser.angus wrote:
> > > However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement
> > > holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already
> > > suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets b
Blesson Paul wrote:
> Hi
> This is an another doubt related to VFS. I want to know
> wheather all files are assigned their inode number at the mounting time itself
> or inodes are assigned to files upon accessing only
er..
inode numbers are assigned at file creation time.
c
Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> use 2.4.5-pre1 instead, Linus has undone the fork()-change for some
> reason ;-)
>
2.4.5-pre1 has it's own problems -
Probably better to use 2.4.4-ac5 instead.
cu
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
"Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" schrieb:
> I am using the Red Hat 7, below are my kernel version. I feel Red Hat 7 is
> quite new, although RH 7.1 has just come out. How come it still say that my
> kernel version is old.
Ah, by old is meant the 2.2 version -
7.1 is the first RH release to ship with ker
"Sim, CT (Chee Tong)" schrieb:
> Hi.. I follow your instruction, but I encounter this issue, my kernel need
> to be upgrade? MAy I know how to determine the current kernel version
uname -a
> and
> how to upgrade it??
Either upgrade to a distro that includes the new kernel
(e.g. latest SuSE or
"David S. Miller" schrieb:
> I'm having a devil of a time finding the tcpblast sources on the
> net, can you point me to where I can get them? The one reference
> I saw to get the original sources was:
>
> ftp://ftp.xlink.net/pub/network/tcpblast.shar.gz
>
> But even that directory no longer exi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
>
> a friend of my asked me on how to make linux easier to use
> for personal/casual win user.
>
>
> from that, i also found out that it is very awkward to type
> username and password every time i use my computer.
> so here's a patch.
Neet hack, but maybe the kern
There is a bit more clarity on the performance degradation
issue now - In fact the degradation only appears when
using iptables. It's just that sometime shortly after 2.4.2,
the hit imposed by iptables got worse.
For instance:
netperf results without iptables with iptables
---
Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Using /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o: unresolved
> > > symbol rwsem_up_write_wake
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.3-ac12/kernel/drivers/char/drm/radeon.o: unresolved
> > > symbol rwsem_down_write
Hi all,
I've been lurking for some time now, unsure of whether
I had some special issues in my own setup, but seeing
these others come forward has emboldened me to speak
out as well.
I am running a RH 7.0 box with all updates and then some,
and generally trying each new 2.4 pre patch or -ac vari
John Jasen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Disconnect wrote:
>
> > (Sending to LKML just so nobody else flips out)
> >
> > OK it wasn't just us. Lemme reassure the admins I just forwarded it to ;)
> >
> > It seems to list the hostname of whoever receives it (neat trick).
>
> sendmail, by default,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Friend:
>
> YOU CAN make over a half million dollars every 4 to 5 months from
> your home for a one time investment of only twenty five U.S.
> Dollars.
This did not originate from toyota.com - The spammer simply
used that domain as the "from" hostname. We are care
Khyron wrote:
> Okay, I've seen various references to problems with loopback
> mounts under (early) 2.2.x kernels. But I don't see any reference
> to a solution (ie. how to umount the stupid thing).
>
> My situation is that I have mounted a CD image on a machine
> for use in kickstart builds. The
Trevor Nichols wrote:
> > Its a kernel bug if it gets stuck like this. You need to provide more info
> > though - what file system, what devices, how much memory. Also ps can give you
> > the wait address of a process stuck in 'D' state which is valuable for debug
>
> ps xl:
> F UID PID PP
Make sure you have up to date modutils package.
Current version is 2.4.5 -
later,
jjs
Marcus Ramos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've moved from kernel 2.2.16 to 2.4.2 (RH7) and its boots OK, except
> for the fact that none of the modules in "/etc/modules.conf" are loaded
> anymore (although modules we
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
> David Konerding wrote:
>
> > And this is described in what release notes? It worked just fine on Red Hat 7.0's
>2.4
> > kernel oh wait, I see that they fixed it before they released it.
>
> And hmm..gee .. did they bother contributing back the code?
Based on th
"Brent D. Norris" wrote:
> > That seems strange. What is realserver failing with ?
>
> It isn't so much failing as it hangs.
It might be interesting to strace the realserver startup
both under 2.2 and 2.4 -
cu
Jup
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Recently my ext2 partition out of space so I have made a regular file
> > in the FAT32 partition and format it as ext2 partiton and mount it as
> > loop device.However,occasionaly when I extract a large tar to the loop device..
> > The comput
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> There is a bug in 2.4.2 with the loop device, which is fixed in -ac series.
Also fixed in 2.4.3-pre series.
cu
Jup
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vge
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The scheduler schedules tasks not interrupts. Unless it manages to thrash the
> cache, the scheduler can not affect routing performance.
OK, thanks for the clarification - I need to get into the source.
cu
Jup
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, J Sloan wrote:
>
> > Fun, yes, and perhaps not directly related, however
> > under high load, where the sheer numbet of interrupts
> > per second begins to overwhelm the kernel, might it
> > not be relevant?
>
>
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, J Sloan wrote:
>
> > There are some scheduler patches that are not part of the
> > main kernel tree at this point (mostly since they have yet to
> > be optimized for the common case) which make quite a big
> > differenc
Just my .02 -
There are some scheduler patches that are not part of the
main kernel tree at this point (mostly since they have yet to
be optimized for the common case) which make quite a big
difference under heavy load - you might want to check out:
http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/
cu
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Note! You only have to have those symlinks on broken systems such
> as Redhat.
This is silly, Red Hat works fine for a great many people.
He probably removed the original kernel-devel package,
which contained the links above, so they would have to
be remade.
> S
Miles Lane wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/cnet/CNET_0-1003-200-5007472.html
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that this article mentions that Unisys has
> no plans to port Linux to it's "cellular multiprocessor"
> machines. So, I am wondering if anyone is working
> on this independantly.
>
> These systems
Mark Hahn wrote:
> > > > > > Well, somethig has broken in ac8, because I lost my PS/2 mouse and
> > > > > me too .
> > No luck.
same here -
> it seems to be the mdelay(2) added to pc_keyb.c in -ac6.
-ac7 is fine here, but when I boot -ac8, there's no ps/2 mouse.
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from t
"Dr. Kelsey Hudson" wrote:
> Under redhat 7 you should use kgcc to compile the kernel, since gcc2.96 is
> inherently broken(*).
Or upgrade to the current Red Hat 7 gcc, which works quite well.
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
"Manfred H. Winter" wrote:
> I'm going back to vanilla 2.4.2 for now. Is there another way to get
> loop to work?
Working fine here:
2.4.2 + Axboe's loop patch + Morton's low latency patch
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message t
Tim Tim wrote:
> I made iso-image from cd with
> dd if=/dev/hdd of=/image.iso
> and mount it with
> mount -o loop /image.iso /mnt/cdrom
> under Linux-2.4.2-pre1 it is working
> but under Linux-2.4.2 do not
> Please help me to understand why
If it was working it was by sheer luck -
You need
Perhaps it's cold comfort, but I found long ago that
3c509 and SB don't mix too well, at least in Linux.
ISA devices are somewhat dumb, switching one
of the cards for a PCI version does the trick here.
SB128, SBlive work fine, or you might want to go
to a 10/100 pci ethernet card.
Just my $.02
Red Hat 7.x running nicely on a number of machines
here w/ no problem, with all apologies to the Red Hat
bashers -
The real problem is loopback is broken, and the
fix still needs to be merged.
In the meantime, Jens Axboe's loop patches will
make it work -
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/p
I'm seeing a similar usb timeout message here
with an HP 5200C usb scanner, e.g:
usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout
usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout
usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout
My config:
AMD-K6 450 on ASUS P5 mb
256 MB RAM, Ali chipset
Red Hat 7.0 updated, kernel 2.4.1-ac8
jjs
John Cavan wrote:
>
Hi,
Just to follow up on my own post, the problem is
way down in the network driver layer, specifically
in the ibmtr driver - it seems to be happy with 2.2,
and barfs with 2.4 - for now I replaced it with an
IBM pci card (olympic driver) and 2.4 is now solid
on the machine that had serious proble
Hi All,
I have 10 systems running 2.4 that are rock solid, but I have
1 system that has problems with 2.4. The box had run perfectly
for 46 days with 2.2.19pre2, and today I installed 2.4.1-ac3
to see how it would go. It seemed to run fine for a few minutes,
then the old problem reasserted itself
Hi,
I discovered that lvm seems to have a problem
with compaq raid controllers - the partitions
don't have the normal names like /dev/sda1,
but instead names like /dev/ida/c0d0p1 -
lvm seems to works OK, but lvmdiskscan freaks...
lvmdiskscan works normally on other systems,
which have conventio
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
>
> Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
> their "SWC 3.0" simply mean 'spec web cheat' and involve implimenting the
>
OK, here's the details you asked about:
Soundblaster Awe 32 sound card
Voodoo 3 pci video card
Running Xfree86-4.0.0 (rpms from 3dfx.com)
Playing unreal tournament, no special game
options, just 800x600 graphics @ 16 bits.
To recap, the symptoms (hung ps, etc) occurred
on kernel 2.4.1-pre8 + low
Sorry, there was no xmms involved here -
The behavior occurred while playing unreal tournament.
But at least the sound card was in use, FWIW -
jjs
David Ford wrote:
> We've narrowed it down to "we're all running xmms" when it happend.
>
> -d
>
> J Sloan wr
Just for the record, the system where I saw the problem
has only ext2 -
jjs
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Yes, I have ReiserFS as well...hrm...
>
> David Ford wrote:
>
> > I can quickly and easily duplicate it on my notebook by playing music or
> > mpegs in xmms. It may take a few minutes but it's guar
OK, It's official now, I didn't know if it was some
weird hardware fluke or something, but one of
the computers here exhibited the same problem -
The system in question is a Pentium II 400, scsi
only (aic7xxx), running 2.4.1-pre8 plus Andrew
Morton's low latency patches.
The user was playing unr
Jason Venner wrote:
> Windows 98 and possibly followons doesn't quite honor 'b' type
> partitions in the extended area of the disk, particularily if you are
> past the 8gig boundary and the partitions in question are over 2gig.
> The above numbers are NOT hard boundaries, I have only seen this on
Nigel Gamble wrote:
> Yes, I most emphatically do disagree with Victor! IRIX is used for
> mission-critical audio applications - recording as well playback - and
> other low-latency applications. The same OS scales to large numbers of
> CPUs. And it has the best desktop interactive response of
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
It was great to see that 2.4.0 reintroduced ipfwadm
support! I had no
need for ipchains and ended up using the wrapper around it that
emulated ipfwadm. However, 2.[02].x used to have "special IP
masquerading modules" such as ip_masq_ftp.o, ip_masq_quake.o, etc.
I
can't find t
Try this shot in the dark:
echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
jjs
snpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have got 2 Linux machine with kernel 2.4.0 i kernel 2.2.18.
> I am in Belgrade , Yugoslavia and I can't access to any hosts :
>
> for example, www.linux.co.yu (Island), www.skyrr.is, www.hotmail.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem: symptoms
>
> It concerns the behaviour of Netscape after upgrading from kernel
> 2.2.16 to 2.4.0. With the new kernel Netscape locates and connects to
> a URL, and sometimes begins to download, but then it just sits there
> indefinitely (without downloading
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Of course, you may be right on wuftpd. It obviously wasn't designed with
> security in mind, other alternatives may be better.
I run proftpd on all my ftp servers - it's fast, configurable
and can do all the tricks I need - even red hat seems to
agree that proftpd is the
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > it might not be important to others, but we do hold one particular
> > SPECweb99 world record: on 2-way, 2 GB RAM, testing a load with a full
>
> And its real world value is exactly the same as the mindcraft NT values. Don't
> forget that.
In other words, devastating.
jjs
Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
> I have RedHat7, glibc-2.2-9, gcc-2.96-69.
>
> I can build 2.4.0 while running kernel 2.2.16.
>
> If I try to rebuild 2.4.0 while running the new kernel, I get random
> compiler errors.
Could you supply the text of the errors, and your .config?
I've been building 2.4.0
Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>
> > In my case, that meant nuking mesa from my system and
> > letting Linux use what was left, which got me back the good
> > accelerated performance - you may choose a less dra
This is a little OT for linux-kernel, but I'll take a swing at it
since I'm running 2.4 and Xfree 4 with a voodoo 3.
After upgrading to Red Hat 7.0, I noticed 3D screensavers
and Quake 3 Arena were dog slow - in the end, I basically
had to make sure the mesa libs didn't get found before the
real
Mike wrote:
> Hi All !
>
> I am installing Redhat 7.0 on my DNS/mail server. Is there any problem
> with Redhat 7.0 you faced or any bug in Redhat 7.0.
There are some bugs, but just make sure to install
all the updates and they will be fixed. BTW gated is
b0rken, I had to roll my own - everythng
Nicolas Parpandet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing 2.4 series for few weeks,
> even the last prerelease
>
> I've seen stranges things :
>
> I cannot access to some ips adresses ! :
> in http or in smtp using "konqueror", "netscape",
> "mail", "telnet 25".
>
> I cannot login to hotmail (in the w
Mike wrote:
> Hi !!
>
> When i boot linux from rescue disk, i get following message:
>
> VFS: Insert root floppy disk to be loaded in RAM disk and press ENTER
>
> Now how can i create a root disk... I am trying to boot Redhat 6.0
A Slackware boot disk can do wonders here -
I never cared for Red
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:09:32PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> > # vgscan
> > vgscan: error while loading shared libraries: vgscan: undefined symbol:
> > lvm_remove_recursive
>
> This looks like an userspace compilation/installation problem of the
Hi folks,
I have 2 servers with lvm trouble, one running
Red Hat 6.2, and the other running Red Hat 7.0
plus latest errata.
Both systems had been running lvm-0.8
on 2.4.0-test for awhile with no problems.
After instaling 2.4.0-prerelease and building
the lvm 0_9-1 source rpm on both systems,
Alan Cox wrote:
> Bzzt, wrong. Red Hat 7 compiles the 2.4 tree beautifully with gcc 2.96 as well.
> Please grow up.
Yes indeed - on my quad CPU Red Hat 7 server, I accidentally
forgot to say CC=kgcc during the last kernel build, and ended
up with a gcc-2.96 built kernel. I decided to let it run
Looks good here in most respects, but still needs makefile fixes -
# modprobe tdfx
/lib/modules/2.4.0-prerelease/kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved
symbol remap_page_range
/lib/modules/2.4.0-prerelease/kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved
symbol __wake_up
/lib/modules/2.4.0-prerelea
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench 48
> > on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
>
> This is almost certainly purely due to changing (some would say "fixing")
> the bd
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> It haven't loaded since test13-pre1 for me.
> Only the 'module version' was broken.
> Last test12-pre7 was fine, here.
> It was introduced with the Makefile cleanups.
>
> --- linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP.oldThu Dec 28 16:27:34 2000
> +++ linux/drivers/char/drm/drmP
Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> Yes your right... I just haven't noticed... Why doesn't someone fix it?
hehe, my guess is the chief kernel honchos don't play much q3a
Hopefully fixing the makefile problem is on their todo list -
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> This is a first for tdfx.o not loading with XFree 4.01.
>
> All prior kernel build through test13-pre5 would load just fine...
>
> Strange...
Very strange - others on this list, self included,
have reported something a bit different:
tdfx.o has not loaded in any kerne
"Hayden A. James" wrote:
> [root@neutron /root]# modprobe tdfx
> /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13pre4-ac2/kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o:
> unresolved symbol remap_page_range
> /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13pre4-ac2/kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o:
> unresolved symbol __wake_up
> /lib/modules/2.4.0-test13pre4
Greetings,
Up to and including -test12, tdfx.o has built and run nicely.
Starting with -test13-pre1, and continuing to -test13-pre4,
tdfx.o (and other modules e,g the olympic.o token ring driver)
have not been successfully created. In general, modules work fine,
it's just a few that have been br
The saga continues into test13-pre3-ac3:
(last good tdfx.o was from test12)
# uname -a
Linux jyro.mirai.cx 2.4.0-test13pre3-ac3 #1 Tue Dec 19 21:26:36 PST 2000 i586
unknown
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
iptable_filter 1872 0 (autoclean) (unused)
ip_nat_ftp
Olaf Titz wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > [J Sloan]
> > >
> > > kernel/drivers/char/drm/tdfx.o: unresolved symbol remap_page_range
> >...
> > Those symbols are rather generic and rather important. Sounds like a
> > g
Niels Kristian Bech Jensen wrote:
> Does this patch fix your problem?
>
> --- test13-pre3/drivers/char/Makefile Mon Dec 18 01:21:31 2000
> +++ linux/drivers/char/Makefile Mon Dec 18 06:58:06 2000
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>
> O_TARGET := char.o
>
> +mod-subdirs := drm
> +
> obj-y += tty_io.o n_tt
Similar problem here - with CONFIG_DRM_TDFX=m
I have not gotten a tdfx.o module complied since the
start of the test13-pre series...
So no quake 3 arena unless I want to play at < 1 fps...
:(
jjs
Albert Cranford wrote:
> With CONFIG_DRM_R128=m
> we fail to produce module linux/drivers/char/dr
Alan Cox wrote:
> > slrnpull --expire on a news-spool of about 600 Mb in 200,000 files gave
> > a lot of 'trying_to_free..' errors.
> >
> > 2.2.18 + VM-global, booted with mem=32M:
> >
> > slrnpull --expire on the same spool worked fine.
>
> I think Andrea just earned his official God status ;)
Greetings,
2.4.0-test12-preXX has been pretty stable here on
a K6/2-450 running ipchains and various net services
in addition to workstation use.
I went to bed last night while others were listening to
xmms on my workstation while working in the room.
This morning I found that xmms was frozen,
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> Anyone out there a whiz at setting up a pppd dialin server? I am
> trying to put together an RPM for pppd dialin configurations
> that will support default Windows NT and Linux dial in clients
> without requiring the poor user to learn bash scripting, chat
> scripting,
Just a data point
I'm listening to mp3s now via xmms, running 2.4.0-test11-pre7
# uname -r -s
Linux 2.4.0-test11-pre7
# rpm -q xmms
xmms-1.2.3-0_helix_1
the "flags/features" switch doesn't seem to hurt it:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family :
Just a quick heads-up -
looks like the md fixes broke something -
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/pagemap.h:17,
from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/locks.h:9,
from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/raid/md.h:37,
from init/main.c:25:
I don't have the asnwer to your particular problem,
but I can provide a data point:
I play mp3s regularly from an nfs server running 2.4.0.testx
(currently test11-pre5), with client also running 2.4.0-testx.
The mp3 directory is automounted on demand. xmms
plays these nfs-mounted mp3s for hours
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> NT and NetWare servers don't stop forwarding
> emails when the load average gets too high -- they just work out of the
> box, and hopefully, no so will Linux (our distribution does now since
> this problem in fixed).
Don't get me started on nt - saying it "just works" i
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> So how come NetWare and NT can detect this at run time, and we have to
> use a .config option to specifiy it? Come on guys.
Linux detects this as well -
However this is not about detection, but optimizations.
Optimizations e.g. for xeon could keep a K6/2 from boo
Thanks Andrea, it all works like a charm with your lvm utils.
But why is the "official" release of the lvm utils so buggy?
Regards,
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.
Greetings,
I'm just getting started playing around with the lvm.
I've used the HP-UX lvm, and was giving the Linux
version a spin for the very first time when I ran into
some big problems:
Let me know if I'm doing something really stupid, but
something tells me a kernel oops is not a good sign!
Ditto here -
Running 8139too drivers on 2.4.0-test9:
8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.10 loaded
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xd1834000, 00:e0:7d:7b:5a:16,
IRQ 10
eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139A'
eth1: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xd1836000, 00:e0:7d:7b:5a:1d,
IRQ 10
e
Thank You!
No wonder the screen draws on quake 3 arena
have seemed so sluggish lately... K6/2 450.
I have seen mtrrs work on this box, I wonder
when they broke - could it have been back in
2.2 that I last saw something meaningful in
/proc/mtrr (?)
hmm...
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
David Ford wrote:
> Did you apply the quota patch that was posted this week?
Yes, thanx for the sanity check -
After the oops, I remembered something about a patch,
and there was indeed one posted by Herr Diehl.
Will check that out - now I'm curious if there's some
reason Linus didn't like the
Hi all,
Just adding my useless complaints the the list -
Currently running test8-pre1 + rik vm patches, very solid.
Tonight I tried test9-pre1 -
The most common occurrence is that vi segfaults on exit.
Here is a decoded oops immediately after booting test9-pre1:
jjs
---
87 matches
Mail list logo
