[PATCH] pci_ids: additional NFORCE MCP61 devices - (resend)

-off-by: Indrek Kruusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lspci output on Gigabyte GA-M61SME-S2 (GF6100/NF405) can be seen from [1],[2] thanks, Indrek __ [1] http://www.hot.ee/bzmeez/nv_mcp61_lspci-n.txt [2] http://www.hot.ee/bzmeez/nv_mcp61_lspci-vv.txt diff -pur linux-2.6.git1/include

[PATCH] pci_ids: additional NFORCE MCP61 devices

-off-by: Indrek Kruusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lspci output on Gigabyte GA-M61SME-S2 (GF6100/NF405) can be seen from [1],[2] thanks, Indrek __ [1] http://www.hot.ee/bzmeez/nv_mcp61_lspci-n.txt [2] http://www.hot.ee/bzmeez/nv_mcp61_lspci-vv.txt diff -pur linux-2.6.git1/include

[FYI] Vendor interest in Unionfs

>> Is there vendor interest in unionfs? > MANY live cds seem to use it I'd like to add that also in embedded area (flash storage) the UnionFS helps in some cases. thanks, Indrek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm2

Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm2/ Wow... it responds despite the load average of 83.63 :) http://www.tuleriit.ee/progs/img/pic1.png http://www.tuleriit.ee/progs/img/pic2.png http://www.tuleriit.ee/progs/img/pic3.png dmes

Re: make OOM more "user friendly"

Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Diego Calleja schrieb: When people gets OOM messages, many of them don't know what is happening or what OOM means. This brief message explains it. --- stable/mm/oom_kill.c.orig2005-04-02 17:44:14.0 +0200 +++ stable/mm/oom_kill.c2005-04-02 18:01:02.000

Re: How's the nforce4 support in Linux?

Jeff Garzik wrote: Indrek Kruusa wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I won't disagree with your experiences. For me, outside of one brief moment when the r8169 driver didn't work on Athlon64, it has worked flawlessly for me.

Re: How's the nforce4 support in Linux?

Jeff Garzik wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I won't disagree with your experiences. For me, outside of one brief moment when the r8169 driver didn't work on Athlon64, it has worked flawlessly for me. RealTek 8169 is currently my favorite gigabit chip. It does not

Re: Intel MB + P4 HT: bios processors logo depends on what?

Indrek Kruusa wrote: A bit silly point maybe but it is somewhat interesting what makes BIOS on Intel motherboard decide which processor's logo to display. Situation: a) Fedora Core 4 test1 + kernel-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4smp - going to reboot from fedora the bios shows always processors logo wi

Intel MB + P4 HT: bios processors logo depends on what?

A bit silly point maybe but it is somewhat interesting what makes BIOS on Intel motherboard decide which processor's logo to display. Situation: a) Fedora Core 4 test1 + kernel-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4smp - going to reboot from fedora the bios shows always processors logo with HT marks b) Mandrake 10

Re: ALSA bugs in list [was Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm1]

> Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Bug 4282] ALSA driver in Linux 2.6.11 causes a kernel panic when > > > loading the EMU10K1 driver > > > > > > > > This one is a real mystery. No one

Re: ALSA bugs in list [was Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm1]

Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >/ On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:/ >/ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ >/ > Subject: [Bug 4282] ALSA driver in Linux 2.6.11 causes a kernel panic when loading the EMU10K1 driver/ >/ > / >/ / >/ This one is a real mystery. No one can reprod

Re: Building server-farm

> I'm looking for a way to connect multiple linux systems > into one big machine (server-farm) and I can't find any > way of enabling it in kernel. It seems that you have to analyse your problem a bit more. There are 5 main types of clusters (or server-farms as you call it): - parallel computing -

Re: Linux 2.6.11-ac1

Yes yes yes! It almost seemed that your work on thesis stuff will kill -ac :( Thank you! Indrek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read th

Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

> I'd love for the -mm tree to get more testing, but it doesn't. So the question is how to hook up more "customers" for testing thing? mm...maybe OSDL should provide special live mini-distro weekly, which will run entirely from 256 MB USB flashdrive :) Lot of automated testing, lot of nice and col

Re: disabling Hyperthreading online

regatta wrote: Hi Is there anyway to disable CPU Hyperthreading without rebooting the system ? You can find possible hint here: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0501.0/1071.html regards, Indrek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

[QUESTION - FYI] Vectorized CRC calculation

Hi! First, sorry about the so-so topic for the kernel developers...but still there are such things inside :) Currently I am investigating how "they" divide those polynomials and which possibilities exists to use SIMD for such calculations. I have found several papers about how to do it with Alti