On Sunday 29 July 2007 07:58, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> -DEVICE_ATTR(authorized_default, 0644,
> - usb_host_authorized_default_show,
> - usb_host_authorized_default_store);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(authorized_default, 0644,
> > + usb_host_authorized_default_show,
Ack, patchse
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:45, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Hi Inaky,
>
> On Tuesday, 27. February 2007, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> > On Monday 26 February 2007 18:18, Alan wrote:
> > > > Yeah, I need semaphore. This is a hw register that says when the hw
> > >
On Monday 26 February 2007 18:18, Alan wrote:
> > Yeah, I need semaphore. This is a hw register that says when the hw
> > is ready to accept a new command. Code that wants to send commands has
> > to down the semaphore and then send it. When hw is ready to get a new
> > command, it sends and IRQ an
On Monday 26 February 2007 16:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:13:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Introduce down_interruptible_timeout() using timers to make the waiter
> > stop waiting by simulating a signal (see first patch for more
> > details). As well introduc
v/null include/linux/timeout.h
--- /dev/null 2004-06-24 14:04:38.0 -0400
+++ 2.6.12-rc4-jak/include/linux/timeout.h 2005-05-18 13:53:14.212416002
-0400
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+/*
+ * Extended timeout specification
+ *
+ * (C) 2002-2005 Intel Corp
+ * Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECT
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> this includes fixes from Daniel Walker, which could fix the plist
>> related slowdown bugs:
> there are still some problems remaining: i just ran Esben Nielsen's
> priority-inheritance validation testsuite, and the plist code gives
> a worst-case l
> Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Remember that it's an URL (so you can't use '%'), and '#' is the
> canonical URL fragment identifier delimiter. (And fragments are
> perfect for this kind of thing, if you look at the RFC, BTW.)
Ouch, true--rule out %...
> Still, why would you esca
> Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just added to git-pasky a possibility to refer to branches
> inside of repositories by a fragment identifier:
> rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git#testing
> will refer to your testing branch in that repository
>>>>> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 18:53 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
>> >>>>> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I see--would the following fit your view?
>>
> I
>>>>> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 18:20 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
>> Back to my example before: in fusyn, a user space lock is a kernel
>> space lock with a wrapper, that provides all that is necessary for
>
>>>>> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 16:37 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> I have to agree with Inaky too. Fundamentally, PI is the same for
> the system regardless of if the locks are user or kernel. I still
> don
> Bill Huey (hui) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I've been thinking about these issues and I believe there are a
> number of misunderstandings here. The user and kernel space mutexes
> need to be completely different implementations. I'll have more on
> this later.
> First of all, priority
> gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Im trying to boot an encrypted file system using an initrd on a
> USB. I use syslinux for the actual boot process as I couldnt get
> Grub to boot of it for some reason. This is the .cfg
> ...
> ...
> ...
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable t
13 matches
Mail list logo
