Has anyone managed to get this motherboard's (tyan tsunami AT) on board
usb to work? I'm currently using an add on pci card to use the usb devices
I have but would _love_ to free that PCI slot up.
Specifics:
Tsunami MB (AT Form factor)
Single processor:
model name : Pentium II (Deschutes)
s
I'm not sure exactly what happened to the machine as I was at work at the
time when it died I had just sshed in to read my daily spam box ;)
Here is the decoded captured oops (klogd provided):
Mar 11 09:36:33 tweetie kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 00
ommand seems to be sequencing wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > >> You might want to try the Adaptec
> > >> supported driver from here:
> > >>
> > >> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/
> > >>
> > >> 6.09 BETA should b
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Joel Franco Guzmán wrote:
[snip]
>
> the problem: The sound card generates a toc.. toc.. toc .. toc...while
> playing a sound using the DSP of the soundcard. Two "tocs"/sec
> aproxiumadetely.
>
Just for giggles, turn down the LINE-IN volume (or mute it) See if the
noise goes
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Leslie Donaldson wrote:
> Hello,
> Just writing in to report a bug in 2.4.0-test12.
> Hardware:
> PCI-Matrox_Mill
> PCI-Adaptec 39160 / 160M scsi card
> PCI-Generic TNT-2 card
> PCI-Sound blaster -128 (es1370)
>
> CPU 21164a - Alpha
I'm also seeing this on 2.4.0 pr
On 2 Jan 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Gregory McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
> > 0
>
> That's your problem. Your limit for overall shm pages is zero. So you
> cannot allocate any shm segments.
>
> echo 200 >
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Gregory McLean wrote:
>
> Hi, I just compiled and booted up 2.4.0-prerelease, dropped into X-Windows
> and now gtk/gnome apps are giving the following warning:
>
> Gdk-WARNING **: shmget failed!
>
> Any ideas on what changed in the shm space to cause th
Hi, I just compiled and booted up 2.4.0-prerelease, dropped into X-Windows
and now gtk/gnome apps are giving the following warning:
Gdk-WARNING **: shmget failed!
Any ideas on what changed in the shm space to cause this?
This is a PII 333 RH 7.0 system 2.4.0-test10 worked just fine on this
mac
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Richard Torkar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Bob_Tracy wrote:
>
> > I *thought* I wanted to buy some memory from Crucial :-). Can't
> > get there from here with my 2.4.0-test7 machine, but Win95 seems
> > to be ok, and 2.
9 matches
Mail list logo