> Giampaolo,
>
> Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2
> and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities...
>
> Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM
> standards, this was the only intention of my "patch".
You're right. Sorry about that.
Thanks,
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't wan
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't wan
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - upda
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Alistair John Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 18.21
>
> ...omissis...
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there ANY reason why this has to be done in the
> kernel? The PPPoATM module for pppd implements (via linux-atm) a
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
> Francois Romieu
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 14.01
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: [Linux-ATM-General]
6 matches
Mail list logo
