Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

2007-04-21 Thread Geert Bosch
On Apr 21, 2007, at 12:18, Willy Tarreau wrote: Also, I believe that (in shells), most forked processes do not even consume a full timeslice (eg: $(uname -n) is very fast). This means that assigning them with a shorter one will not hurt them while preserving the shell's performance against

Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems

2007-01-04 Thread Geert Bosch
On Jan 4, 2007, at 13:34, Segher Boessenkool wrote: The "signed wrap is undefined" thing doesn't fit in this category though: -- It is an important optimisation for loops with a signed induction variable; It certainly isn't that important. Even SpecINT compiled with -O3 and top-of-tree GC