Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-29 Thread Gary Zambrano
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 18:39 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > We check for 0x because that is often how a fault is indicated, > when the memory location is read during or immediately after hotplug (or > if the PCI bus is truly faulty). So for most hardware, you see > > tmp = read(irq status)

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-29 Thread Gary Zambrano
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 22:45 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 29 May 2007 16:14:35 Gary Zambrano wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 16:55 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > On Monday 28 May 2007 16:12:12 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > > > > On Monday 28

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-29 Thread Gary Zambrano
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 16:55 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 28 May 2007 16:12:12 Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > > On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Can you also test the following patch? > > > I think there's a bug in b44 that is doesn't properly discard > > > shared IRQs,

Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)

2007-05-29 Thread Gary Zambrano
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 13:55 -0700, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 28 May 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 19:44 +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > > > > Can you please keep CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS and CONFIG_NOHZ and try the > > > > following combinations on the ke

[PATCH] dma-mapping.h

2007-02-16 Thread Gary Zambrano
not exist on these architectures. Signed-off by: Gary Zambrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h b/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h index 9bc46b4..7d01450 100644 --- a/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/asm-arm/dma-mapping.h @@ -294,6 +294,24 @@ dma_unmap