On 10/27/20 1:22 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2020-10-26 23:53:20 [-0700], Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I get a compilation error (see below)
when trying to do a debug build (building rpm packages for Fedora). 5.9.1 +
rt19...
Builds
On 10/21/20 6:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2020-10-21 14:53:27 [+0200], To Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt18 patch set.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I get a compilation error (see
below) when trying to do a debug build (buildin
On 10/27/2017 03:27 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.13.10-rt3 patch set.
Thanks!! Wonderful!
I'm seeing this (old Lenovo T510 running Fedora 26):
[ 54.942022]
[ 54.942023] WARNING: pos
On 07/25/2015 03:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.1.3-rt3 patch set.
...
I've had a few hangs with nothing left behind to debug... but today I
find this:
(NOTE: I'm attaching a file with the details, I don't know if my mailer
will mangle
On 06/09/2015 03:05 PM, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
09.06.2015 19:45, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano пишет:
This is still happening, about once a day. John Dulaney help me set up a
crash kernel dump (thanks!) so now I have a kernel core dump for this
one,
Asus,Fedora,CGROUPS, iptables,snd_ac97,radeon
On 05/28/2015 06:56 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Oh well. Second time the machine hangs in two days in the same way
(otherwise very stable running 3.18.x-rty)
(this is a bumblebee + bbswitch graphics laptop - argh, if I had known
better...)
May 28 18:49:21 localhost kernel
On 05/26/2015 12:41 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see a
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see a WARN_ON_NONRT, but not a
WARN_ON_NORT. Does this compile?
On 05/19/2015 02:39 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.0.4-rt1 patch set.
Great!!
Changes since v3.18.13-rt10
- Rebase to v4.0.
- David Hildenbrand's series of decouple of preempt_disable from
pagefault_disable is part of the series.
Whil
On 05/02/2014 04:37 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2014-04-26 11:29:04 [-0700]:
Saw this a moment ago (3.14.1 + rt1, Fedora 19 laptop - I think I
have seen something similar in 3.12.x-r):
Yes, you did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/163
You did not test I&#x
On 04/11/2014 11:57 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.14-rt1 patch setty).
Changes since v3.12.15-rt25
- I dropped the sparc64 patches I had in the queue. They did not apply
cleanly, the code in v3.14 changed in the MMU area. Here is where I
On 02/14/2014 02:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[] []
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[] []
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact location inside of smp_call_function_many via
addr2line please ?
Hope this is useful (adding 0x2ce
Hi all,
I'm seeing these BUGs with 3.12.9-rt13 finally caught the messages.
I was getting frozen machines with no traces left behind, this could
possibly be it (see below - I have to retest with rt15)
-- Fernando
[771508.546420] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 23s! [SweepSinVsUsm:142
Hi all,
Just got this on 3.10.20-rt17, ThinkPad T510 running Fedora 19 (I think
it has happened a few times before). The machine is not completely dead,
the mouse pointer moves around but otherwise display updates and
keyboard response are nil.
-- Fernando
Nov 29 23:17:52 localhos
On 08/23/2013 10:56 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2013-08-23 10:18:08 [-0700]:
Please post a patch when/if you have it so I can retry the build...
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Does this fix your trobule?
Yes, it does, thanks! Builds, installs and
On 08/23/2013 12:08 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/23/2013 07:50 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
- hwlat improvements by Steven
Known issues:
...
Trying to build I get (in make modules):
ERROR: "__udivdi3" [dr
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.9-rt5 patch set.
Thanks!,
Changes since v3.10.9-rt4
- swait fixes from Steven. It fixed the issues with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
where the system suddenly froze and RCU wasn't doing its jo
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says that it is wrong to use
On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patc
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
I'm getting this when trying to build:
drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit declarati
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
---
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c: In function 'nfc_llcp_register_device':
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1185:24: error: expected ex
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > > History:
> > &
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo... back to testing.
> > History:
> >
> > 2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
> > 2.6.24-r
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > &
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Nope, it doesn't still getting "delay" and "xrun" messages galore.
> >
> > Attached: configuration and dmesg output bo
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I
> > saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve
> > eve
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
>
> This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix
> has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and boot
> I'll try rt12...
>
> Same problems in rt12, getting lots of "delay of xxx usecs exceeds
> estimated spare time of ; restart" in jackd (on my T61 Lenovo laptop
> running fc7). Does not happen with 2.6.22.10 + rt9. This is both with
> the internal snd-hda-intel card and a pcmcia rme hdsp multi
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 17:02 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
> having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
> agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
>
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12 for 2.6.23.9!, argh! :-) and wanted to compare with 2.6.22.x
and the latest I
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:55 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
>
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest rt kernel I released has broken suspend
(tested on fc6 & fc7, stock Fedora kernel works fine - the rt
configuration files are virtual clones as far as possible of the
standard Fedora kernel config
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
> > happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
>
> thanks!
Thanks for the pat
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
-- Fernando
Forwarded Message
From: Matt Barber
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] atl1 driver; sleeping function
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:09:58 -0400
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > apparently you caught that 3 seconds window where the .23-rc1-rt1
> > > release script moved old patches into the older/ directory :-)
> >
&g
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > * Ru
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
> >
> > does -rt
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rui Nuno Capela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
>
> does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone... was about to download it and it
dissapeared.
-- Fernando
-
To unsubsc
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, Christoph,
>
> recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see th
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > does lockdep pinpoint anything?
> >
> > Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem.
> > Hopefully some of this will h
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > &g
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > &g
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
> > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
> > st
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
> > reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
> > st
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> we are pleased to announce the v2.6.22.1-rt3 kernel
>
> Attention!
>
> Ingo is off for a long weekend and therefor the download location for
> this release is:
>
> http://www.tglx.de/projects/preempt-rt/2.6.22.1
>
> more info about
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 15:36 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
> > > > >
> > > > > -
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
> > > >
> > > > - Fixed a nasty and hard to track down slowness / boot problem on SMP
> > > >
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 15:10 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, July 4, 2007 21:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21.5-rt19 kernel on behalf of Ingo.
> >
> >
> > It can be downloaded from the usual place:
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-pre
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 21:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, this is happening in a brand new laptop, a Lenovo t61 with a
> > 7700 processor and the Santa Rosa chipset.
> >
> > Lukewarm IQ det
Hi Ingo, this is happening in a brand new laptop, a Lenovo t61 with a
7700 processor and the Santa Rosa chipset.
Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking
BUG: at kernel/cpu.c:44 lock_cpu_hotplug()
[] dump_trace+0x64/0x105
[] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c
[] show_trace+0xf/0x11
[] dump_stack+0x1
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:20 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Ingo, I'm seeing this on 2.6.21.5-rt14 and 2.6.21.5-rt15, this
> problem did not happen in 2.6.21.3-rt9 (last I checked on this
> hardware). The computer is an athlon x2 and eth0 is "alias eth0 skge"
Hi Ingo, I'm seeing this on 2.6.21.5-rt14 and 2.6.21.5-rt15, this
problem did not happen in 2.6.21.3-rt9 (last I checked on this
hardware). The computer is an athlon x2 and eth0 is "alias eth0 skge",
the BUGs trigger on network activity (but not a constant stream of
them)...
BUG: scheduling with i
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:07 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 21:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Much better performance in terms of xruns with Jackd. Hardly any at
> >
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 21:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Much better performance in terms of xruns with Jackd. Hardly any at
> > all as it should be. I'm starting to test -rt8 right now.
> >
> >
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have released the 2.6.19-rt6 tree, which can be downloaded from the
> usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> more info about the -rt patchset can be found on the RT wiki:
>
> http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
>
>
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could you try the patch below? It changes trace entries to be measured
> via get_cycles() again [which should be must faster than pmtimer on your
> CPU], but keeps t
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled,
> > a jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting
> &g
Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled, a
jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting some
(hopefully) meaningful data.
I'm running a script that samples /etc/latency_trace every second and
logs the maximums to a file.
First attachment: jackd
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ok, i reproduced something similar on one of my boxes and it turned
> > > out to be a tracer bug. I've uploaded -rt10, could you try it? (The
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, can you see the xruns/latencies with latencytest too? (That one
> might be easier to reproduce for me.)
I can do that. Is this the old latency test script?
(http://
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:43 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > (japa-4096 |#0): new 17 us maximum-latency wakeup.
> > > > > ( beagled-3412 |#1): new 19 us maximum-latency wa
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:35 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:04 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:04 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (a normal non-root user was left logged in and was running jackd with
> > realtime privileges, irqs' priority reordered with the rtirq script -
>
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
>
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
> > using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
> &
Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
qjackctl / jackd (jack 0.102.25, qjackctl 0.2.21):
alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 0.034 msecs
11:38:03.681 XRUN callback (154).
delay of 18710.000 usecs e
(testing -rt8 but just in case)
I got this overnight, found the machine catatonic this morning, machine
is an Athlon X2 4400 running FC6 x86_64 booting into a rebuilt
2.6.19-rc6-rt7 rpm package based on Ingo's packages (same .config except
for 4KSTACKS=off). I'm including a dmesg after the reboot
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 00:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do a "tar cvf usr.tar /usr" just to read/write a lot to disk (this
> > within the same SATA disk). Watch memory being used in a system
> > monito
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:39, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:03 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
> > hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
> > so
Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
software: 2.6.13 smp + patch-2.6.13-rt1, PREEMPT_DESKTOP
jack 0.100.4, current cvs
alsa 1.0.10rc1
This is the sequence of events. Start J
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 22:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm ge
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:45, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:15 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I&#x
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for
> > i386:
>
> hm, cannot reproduce this build problem on my current tree - could
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Raymond Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I remember there's a kernel pcmcia bug preventing the development for
> > the Audigy2 pcmcia notebook sound card driver.
> >
> > See
> > http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/index.php
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 05:46, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >>>And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it'
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it's
> > completely obvious to anyone who knows the first thing about MIDI that
> > HZ=250 will fail in situations where HZ=1000 su
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:33, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 14:32:02 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 7/13/05, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:10 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> > So we should ai
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:15, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 Jul 2005 22:02, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a completely unrelated question, but now we've got everything
> > > under control.. how do I make "quiet" actually do
84 matches
Mail list logo
