On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:11:07PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> >
> > The kernel provides this information -- sort of:
> > It contains the TIOCTTYGSTRUCT syscall which returns a struct. Of course,
> > it changes between different kernel archs and
So ... how can a revoke system call be implemented without changing vfs
too much? IMHO this system call is missed. There are some really interesting
interfaces using block or character devices which shouldn't be usable for users
because of the lack of secure revoking of such a device. Therefore
Hi,
hopefully this mail isn't lost because of a nervous `d' finger ;^)
Last week I've finished the work on the system call revoke for 2.4 and
done some changes on it suggested by the vendors security list.
Due to the security issue of the syscall revoke, it would nice to see
this patch goin
3 matches
Mail list logo