ff-by: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
block/ioctl.c |9 +++--
fs/partitions/check.c | 35 ---
include/linux/genhd.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
index 52d6385..662
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 03:50:29PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On 11/2/07, Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > @@ -554,8 +573,11 @@ int rescan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, struct
> > > > block_device *bdev)
> > > >
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 02:04:39PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > IIRC, Al recently vetoed a similar patch. As far as I'm concerned,
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > the correct return values, the patch then looks fine to me.
> >
> > So Al, are you ok with this one?
Still haven't seen f
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:31:12PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:56:08 -0700,
> Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > IIRC, Al recently vetoed a similar patch. As far as I'm concerned, with
> > > > the correct return
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:09:34AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:07:42 +0100,
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > -void add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part, sector_t start,
> > > sector_t len, int flags)
> > > +int add_partition(struct gendisk *
/D
[PATCH] hidinput_connect ignores retval from input_register_device
signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel &l
gt;part_uevent_suppress)
> > + kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
> > + kobject_del(&p->kobj);
>
> You need a kobject_put() here to drop the reference you obtained in
> kobject_init().
done
We should be getting close
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:49:03AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On 10/29/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >>
> >>> [INPUT] hidinput_connect incorrectly ignored
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:06:57PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:22:11 -0700,
> Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > @@ -390,20 +390,31 @@ void add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int part,
> > sector_t start, sector_t le
[PATCH] pciserial_resume_one ignored return value of pci_enable_device
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/8250_pci.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c b/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c
index 0
Yet another issue where we ignore errors - this needs someone to make sure that
I am passing around the right error codes (and am cleaning up correctly)
[PATCH] add_partition silently ignored errors
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
block/ioctl.c |5 +++
gned-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/hid/hid-input.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-input.c b/drivers/hid/hid-input.c
index dd332f2..880161b 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-input.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-in
[INPUT] hidinput_connect incorrectly ignored return value from
input_register_device
Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/hid/hid-input.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-input.c b/drivers/hid/hid-i
On 1/31/07 3:30 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
>> Don't confused KS with a conference;
>> it is a workshop for a very, very large, very very active project.
>
> ... and *growing*, which is the real issue I think.
>
> Something that might make sense for K
On 1/29/07 8:22 PM, "Greg Ungerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Yep. IIRC the CPU architects panel was all x86/x86_64/ppc too wasn't it?
>>
>> I thought there was coldfire mentioned too, or maybe my memory is
>> playing tricks on me. Maybe I'm misremembering the ppc bit.
>
> Your right, the p
On 1/29/07 8:10 PM, "Dave Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
> sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
for ex
On 1/25/07 12:51 PM, "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For the first time in many years I'm strongly considering actually
>>> going to the kernel summit, however if it goes back to Ottawa I
>>> definitely will stop going again.
>>
>> Is that specific to Ottawa, or is this any North Ame
On 1/23/07 9:57 AM, "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Definitely disagree with that. I'd like to see the conference somewhere
>> else different this time - perhaps Czech Republic, or somewhere else more
>> easterly and Linux active (or even Finland...)
>
> This is my position as well.
18 matches
Mail list logo
