Re: DPT I2O RAID and Linux I2O

T i2o raid card users would be useful > > Alan > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: EATA driver with DPT SmartRAID V

ivers for the card. I've asked them to make > a few more changes for me but their change making cycle seems very slow and > I'm waiting for the next round. Is it possible to get this beta somewhere? I'd like to try it. -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine

Re: EATA driver with DPT SmartRAID V

tributed Processing Technology SmartRAID V Controller (rev > > 2). > > This card isnt supported by the eata driver. Is there any other way to make it working under 2.4.x? Only working drivers are up to 2.2.16. I tried to compile them for 2.2.17 from RH 6.2 updates, but they hang u

EATA driver with DPT SmartRAID V

/eata.o failed /lib/modules/2.4.2-ac28/kernel/drivers/scsi/eata.o: insmod eata failed I tried also default settings provided in eata.c, but this does not help. If anyone had a success with this device, please let me know. Thanks in advance. -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine

Strange lines in dmesg

d 1.5Gb of swap... It looks like it is again a problem with kernel does not use all possibilities before kill a process. And what worries me is that I found mentioned above lines in kernel log. -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

O_DSYNC flag for open

Hello, one small question... Will O_DSYNC flag be available in Linux? It is available at least on AIX, and HP-UX. The difference with O_SYNC is the same as between fsync and fdatasync. Any comments? -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine -- E-Mail: [EMAIL

Q: How to get physical memory size from user space without proc fs

idea, but it is assumed that this program is the only one running on the machine. I do not want to use proc as some people can just do not mount it. Any comments, suggestions? Thanks in advance. Denis Perchine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: fsync vs fdatasync on Linux

On Sunday 18 February 2001 18:22, Denis Perchine wrote: > Hello, > > as fas as I can see from fdatasync man page, and from the latest kernel > sources (2.4.1ac3, fs/buffer.c), they are equivalent. > > Using of fdatasync in database can gain significant gain on systems which &g

fsync vs fdatasync on Linux

any plans to implement this correctly? And due to what problems it was not implemented yet? -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/ FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5 -- - To

Re: NT soon to surpass Linux in specweb99 performance?

time update turned off in its case. MS do this. > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001127-00075.html -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/ FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5

Re: Bad behavior of recv on already closed sockets.

h mod_perl. Actually this connection should be closed, if there was a failure, but somehow it is not. And possibly it is a fd in DBD::Pg code (or libpq code). I will think how to check this... -- Sincerely Yours, Denis Perchine -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HomePage:

Bad behavior of recv on already closed sockets.

Linux Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:51:46 +0600 From: Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have quite strange problem. It's lsof -i -n -P postmaste 20018 postgres6u IPv4 12241380 TCP 127.0.0.1:5432->127.0.0.1:6651 (CLOSE) And there is