On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But GNU tar does not handle acls and xattrs. So back to rsync/cp/mv.
Huh? The version of tar on my Fedora 8 desktop (tar-1.17-7) does. Just
add the --xattrs option (which turns on --acls and --selinux).
-Dave
--
To unsu
On Feb 19, 2008 10:10 AM, Pierre Ossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somewhere post 2.6.24, the kernel started getting very
> temperamentful. I experience random hangs and wedges very often.
FWIW, on my Fedora 8 Dell Vostro 1000 notebook, ever since updating to
kernel 2.6.23.15-137 I am getting fr
On 8/27/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now that I'm looking at the kernel bugzilla .. If you set the kernel
> version to 2.6.22 and set the "Regression" check box you could denote
> the fact that it's a regression in that kernel version ..
>
> I don't know if this URL is going to co
On 8/26/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
> a regression field, but there are no difference between
> 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Here's how to use Bugzilla to track regressions between different
kernel versions:
Create
On 12/13/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So a challange to the kernel hackers: build a mail filtering/proxy
system, a' la BSD.
I don't remember the specification and features, but IIRC the
netfilter is not enough to do the graylisting (but pf was).
Someone has some hints what
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:20:03PM +0300, L. K. wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Philips wrote:
>
> > Kelvins good idea in general - it is always positive ;-)
> >
> > 0.01*K fits in 16 bits and gives reasonable range.
> >
> > but may be something like K<<6 could be a option? (to allow u
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:52:03AM +, John William wrote:
>
> The curse of the HP Vectra XU 5/90 strikes again!
>
> What is interesting is that I tried the NetGear FA310, FA311, 3COM 3cSOHO
> and 3C905C-TX cards and both the receive and transmit speeds (measured with
> both iperf and netpe
I don't know myself, (it sounds like other bigmem problems), but setting up a
2GB swap file is easy enough to test. :-)
-Dave
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:29:39AM +0200, Marcin Kowalski wrote:
>
> I found this post of interest. I have 1.1 Gig of RAM but only 800mb of
> Swap as I expect NOT to us
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 01:05:04AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I've got one of the two problems fixed here at the test lab, and am
> working on the second. Hopefully this week I'll have this sorted out,
> and a driver for you guys to test.
Sounds great, let me know when you have it sorted out
Hi,
dhcpcd is still broken in 2.4.5 when using the stock 8139too driver as
referenced in this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=9884722973&w=2&r=1
Going back to the 8139too driver in 2.4.3 fixes it.
I see that Alan has reverted back to the 2.4.3 driver for his ac-series for
other reas
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:53:45AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> No, reiserfs does have badblock support
>
> You just have to get it as a separate patch from us because it was written after
> code freeze.
Any chance that you'll be putting them on www.namesys.com for easy download?
-Dave
-
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:28:20PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
> Am Freitag, 13. April 2001 18:07 schrieb David Rees:
>
> > Cconfig and setup looks OK.
> >
> > What happens if your run hdparm -t /dev/hda and /dev/hdc at the same time?
>
> Good idea!
> The perfo
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:36:55PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
> Mark Hahn schrieb:
> > > hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
> > > hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
> > > hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
> >
> > md0 is composed of partitions located where on hda and hdc?
> > also, what's your CPU?
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 05:21:36PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I've got a Gateway here with a Intel 815 chipset running 2.2.18. Inside
> > it's a PIII 733 with 512MB and a Quantum lct15 drive.
>
> The UDMA100 on the i810/815 is supported by 2.4
>
> > turn it on? The drive should be capable of 1
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:12:07PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > I've got a Gateway here with a Intel 815 chipset running 2.2.18. Inside
>
> why? 2.2 is obsolete, and will not receive new drivers.
Hmm, so the Intel 815 and DMA doesn't mix with 2.2.x? What about
Andre's IDE patches?
> > The pro
I've got a Gateway here with a Intel 815 chipset running 2.2.18. Inside
it's a PIII 733 with 512MB and a Quantum lct15 drive.
The problem is that the IDE driver doesn't recognize the IDE
conroller, so DMA isn't enabled leading to some poor drive
performance. Here's the relevant sections from ls
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Unfortunately the missing files in directory listings from SGI Irix
> > 6.5.9f NFS servers still persists with the 2.4 kernel - we used the
> > kernel 2.4.0 kernel that came with the Redhat 7.1beta
> > uname -a tells Linux test-ah1 2.4.0-0.99.11 #1 Wed Jan
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:27:10AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> It's getting very lonely testing this stuff. It would be useful if
> someone else could help out - at least running the bw_tcp tests. It's
> pretty simple:
>
> bw_tcp -s ; bw_tcp 0
OK, here's my bw_tcp results on a K6-2 45
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> Ok, how about we list the known bugs:
>
> zeros in log files, apparently only between bytes 2048 and 4096 (not
> reproduced yet).
Could this bug be related to the reported corruption that people with
new VIA chipsets have been als
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:00:09PM +, Padraig Brady wrote:
> Chris Hanson wrote:
>
> >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:48:50 +
> >From: Padraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Are you using the 3c59x driver?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Can we sort this out once and for all? There are a few
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:53:59AM -0800, David Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > celeron 433 intel i810. 320MB ram.
> >
> > Before 2.2.18. Now I've tested with both
> > 2.4.1-pre12 and 2.4.1. 2.4 kernel k
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:30:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> celeron 433 intel i810. 320MB ram.
>
> Before 2.2.18. Now I've tested with both
> 2.4.1-pre12 and 2.4.1. 2.4 kernel klogd is
> always using 99% cpu. What gives?
>
> I've three other less powerful boxes running
> 2.4.x kerne
I've been trying different 2.4.1-pre kernels trying to find one that
doesn't end up with klogd pegging the CPU. 2.4.0 is OK, but
2.4.1-pre10 to 2.4.1 all leave klogd sitting at 100% CPU.
The machine in question is a Gateway E-3200, a basic PIII-500 running RH
7.0 with all the latest updates a
The link to http://www.samba.org/netfilter/iptables-1.1.1.tar.bz2 is
invalid in 2.4.0, this patch simply removes the link.
-Dave
--- linux/Documentation/Changes.origMon Jan 1 10:00:04 2001
+++ linux/Documentation/Changes Tue Jan 9 09:37:20 2001
@@ -336,7 +336,6 @@
Netfilter
-
o
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:59:00PM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> I moved from 2.2.18pre15 to 2.2.18pre17 and now I get the following
> usb-uhci stuff being spewed to my terminal:
>
> Oct 20 20:54:19 plato kernel: usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 3, frame# 704
> Oct 20 20:54:20 plato kernel: usb-uh
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:02:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > I'll give the usb-uhci driver in 2.2.18pre17 another shot tonight.
>
> Let me know how it goes.
Same thing. Now I only have my Intellimouse plugged into the USB port.
The messages seem to start appearing when gpm starts up...
Oct
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:02:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:47:16PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> >
> > This is on a Tyan Trinity 1598 Socket 7 motherboard. No hubs of any sort.
>
> No external hubs? Then why is the hub driver seeing both a 2 por
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:51:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 08:21:53AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> >
> > Nothing else odd changed. Here's the boot sequence and messages which
> > repeated endlessly after booting 2.2.18pre16 with the usb-uhci dri
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 01:46:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 10:49:56PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> >
> > Well, the real interesting part is that I was using the usb-uhci.c driver
> > in 2.2.18pre15, and now in 2.2.18pre16 it stopped working for my mouse
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:32:01PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2000, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In 2.2.18pre16 an alternative USB_UHCI driver under the option
> > CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT was added. Only this one works for me, and
> > C
In 2.2.18pre16 an alternative USB_UHCI driver under the option
CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT was added. Only this one works for me, and
CONFIG_USB_UHCI throws up 50 messages a second like this one:
Oct 16 00:12:22 spoke kernel: usb-uhci.c: interrupt, status 3, frame# 188
and leaves my mouse in an unusabl
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:16:53AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I've noticed this behavior for a few kernel revisions now, up to and
> > including 2.2.17. It would be nice to get this bug worked out before
> > 2.2.18.
>
> I dont think that is likely to happen. Every time someone touches the tulip
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 06:25:34PM -0700, J. S. Connell wrote:
> Any time I disconnect and then reconnect the ethernet cable from my Netgear
> FA310TX cards, the card appears to not notice and doesn't reestablish the
> link. Under 2.2.17pre4, the link light comes on, but until I do ifconfig
> eth
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 02:10:31PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > kernel proper and working. If it *IS* ready now, what sort of
> > Athlon hardware is recommended for a developmental machine?
>
> I HIGHLY recommend duron/thunderbird, KT133, PC133, UDMA machines;
> they work very well with modern (2
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 12:52:07AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> o USB build bug fix (Arjan van de Ven)
It looks like the wrong USB build bug fix got included into
2.2.18pre12. Jeff Garzik and Greg KH commented that because the uhci_init
function uses initcalls, t
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:39:22AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>
> Yes, that looks like 2.4.0-test9 now, except that it should
> be done for ohci also, although you don't need it for your
> config.
Right, but it doesn't look like the usb-ohci driver uses initcalls like
the other functions. I co
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:13:24AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11:
> >
> > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init':
> > > drivers/usb/usbdr
Thanks,
This does the trick.
-Dave
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 09:23:29AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11:
>
> > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init':
> > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): u
I'm getting this compile time error on 2.2.18pre11:
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `usb_init':
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x6deb): undefined reference to `uhci_init'
Complete .config is located at
http://spoke.nols.com/~drees/config-2.2.18pre11
USB related config is below.
-Dave
#
# USB sup
39 matches
Mail list logo
